Table 2.
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence profile
Quality assessment | No. of patients | Effect | Quality | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of studies | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Omega-3 supplementation | Control | Relative (95% CI) | Absolute (95% CI) | |
Mortality | ||||||||||
17 | Not serious | Not serious | Seriousa | Not seriousb | None | 149/629 (23.7%) | 161/610 (26.4%) | RR 0.85 (0.71 to 1.03) | 40 fewer per 1000 (from 8 more to 77 fewer) | Moderate |
ICU length of stay | ||||||||||
12 | Seriousc | Seriousd | Seriousa | Not serious | None | 469 | 456 | – | MD 3.79 days fewer (5.49 fewer to 2.09 fewer) | Very low |
Duration of mechanical ventilation | ||||||||||
7 | Seriousc | Seriouse | Seriousa | Not serious | None | 254 | 241 | – | MD 2.27 days fewer (4.27 fewer to 0.27 fewer) | Very low |
CI confidence interval, RR relative risk, MD mean difference
aWe rated down the quality of evidence by one level for multiple sources of indirectness. Population: mechanical ventilation and sepsis severity varied as inclusion criteria across studies. Intervention: content of enteral/parenteral formulations differed across studies (10 used fish oil alone while 7 used formulae with additional supplements such as mRNA, arginine, and selenium). Outcome: different mortality definitions (28-day, 60-day, in-hospital, ICU)
bWe did not rate down the quality of evidence for imprecision. The CI included both significant benefit and small harm, but the number of events was not small
cWe rated down the quality of evidence by one level for risk of bias. Several studies showed high risk of attrition bias and performance bias
dWe rated down the quality of evidence by one level for significant unexplained heterogeneity (P < 0.00001, I 2 = 82%)
eWe rated down the quality of evidence by one level for significant unexplained heterogeneity (P = 0.02, I 2 = 60%)