Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 5;7:2754. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02940-5

Table 3.

Results of the fledging mass, Hp and NOx model selection procedure based on AICc.

AICc ∆ AICc Akaike weight
Fledging mass model
s 1834.9 0 0.622
light + s 1835.9 1 0.378
Haptoglobin model
b + ld + s + noise + light + light:s 2651.3 0.00 0.093
b + s + light + noise + light:s + noise: light 2651.3 0.07 0.090
b + ld + s + light + noise + light:s + noise: light 2651.6 0.38 0.077
ld + s + light + noise + light:s 2651.7 0.44 0.074
b + s + light + noise + light:s 2651.9 0.60 0.069
b + ld + s + light + noise 2651.9 0.60 0.069
b + ld + s + noise 2652.1 0.81 0.062
b + s + light + noise + noise: light 2652.3 1.06 0.055
ld + s + light + noise 2652.4 1.11 0.053
b + s + light + noise 2652.4 1.18 0.052
b + ld + light + noise 2652.6 1.35 0.047
b + ld + s + light + noise + noise: light 2652.6 1.38 0.047
ld + s + noise 2652.7 1.44 0.045
b + s + noise 2652.7 1.47 0.045
ld + s + light + noise + light:s + noise: light 2652.8 1.50 0.044
b + ld + noise 2652.8 1.52 0.044
ld + light + noise 2653.2 1.93 0.035
Nitric oxide model
fledging mass 612.8 0 0.73
fledging mass + s 614.8 1.99 0.27

Linear mixed models with “NestID” as random factor were used to avoid pseudoreplication. Top ranked models included noise in combination with sex (s), light, brood size (b), laying date (ld), fledging mass, the interaction light:sex (light:s) and/or the interaction noise:light. Fledging mass models were run on data from 562 nestlings from 85 nests; Hp models on data from 475 nestlings from 78 nests and NOx models on data from 344 nestlings from 58 nests. Only models within ∆ AICc < 2 of the top model are shown.