Table 2.
Genotype | Temp. (Dev. – > Adult) | Period ± SEM (Hours) | Power ± SEM | Rhythmic (%) | n | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4 | 19 – > 19 | 24.4 | ± | 0.6 | 2 | ± | 1 | 6 | 36 |
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 19 – > 19 | 24.4 | ± | 0.6 | 6 | ± | 1 | 19&& | 52 |
nahar;; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 19 – > 19 | 24.6 | ± | 0.1 | 61 | ± | 7 | 89∗∗ | 28 |
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4 | 29 – > 29 | 23.5 | 3 | ± | 2 | 8 | 13 | ||
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 29 – > 29 | 24.1 | ± | 0.1 | 43 | ± | 6 | 83∗∗ | 24 |
nahar;; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 29 – > 29 | 23.8 | ± | 0.0 | 42 | ± | 5 | 88∗∗ | 33 |
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4 | 19 – > 29 | 24.9 | ± | 0.5 | 8 | ± | 2 | 27 | 30 |
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 19 – > 29 | 24.1 | ± | 0.1 | 62 | ± | 6 | 89∗∗ | 37 |
nahar;; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 19 – > 29 | 24.0 | ± | 0.0 | 64 | ± | 7 | 88∗∗ | 34 |
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na UAS-Nlf-1 RNAi | 19 – > 29 | 24.8 | ± | 0.3 | 21 | ± | 6 | 46&& | 13 |
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na UAS-Nlf1 | 19 – > 29 | 23.9 | ± | 0.2 | 26 | ± | 8&& | 71 | 7 |
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4 | 29 – > 19 | 21.5 | 1 | ± | 0 | 2 | 50 | ||
nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 29 – > 19 | 24.1 | ± | 0.2 | 10 | ± | 2 | 34∗∗&& | 68 |
nahar;; Clk8.0GAL4/ UAS-na | 29 – > 19 | 24.5 | ± | 0.2 | 33 | ± | 4 | 66∗∗ | 62 |
Rhythmicity analyses from adult Drosophila males maintained in 5–6 days LD conditions followed by 7 days DD. Genotypes indicated in the left column. Temp. column indicates the temperature (°C) that crosses were raised at (Dev.) followed by the temperature of the adult behavioral assay. Power indicates chi-squared periodogram power minus significance. Significant differences from the corresponding mutant controls (nahar; tubGAL80ts; Clk8.0GAL4) and/or constitutive rescue (nahar; Clk8.0GAL4/UAS-na) are indicated by ∗ (∗∗p < 0.01) or & (&&p < 0.01), respectively. Significance was determined using Fisher’s exact test..