Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;12(5):718–728. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx003

Table 2.

Regions significantly activated by the predictor contrast ‘positive vs negative’

peak
region H x y z t p n
amygdala L −27 −4 −10 5.4 0.000002 22
amygdala R 24 −7 −8 5.2 0.000003 9
hippocampus L −18 −13 −10 4.8 0.000013 11
hippocampus R 21 −13 −9 4.7 0.000016 17
caudate R 8 −1 10 4.3 0.000065 4
globus pallidus L −24 −7 −4 4.7 0.000016 11
globus pallidus R 25 −12 −3 4.7 0.000020 8
putamen L −29 −7 −5 4.9 0.000009 82
putamen R 30 −17 −2 5.1 0.000004 48
striatum R,L 0 −4 10 5.3 0.000002 7
thalamus L −6 −25 7 4.9 0.000010 28
thalamus R 3 −6 10 4.8 0.000012 41
VTA and SN R,L 20 −13 −6 5.0 0.000006 13
inferior parietal lobule (BA 40) R 60 −37 19 5.8 <0.000001 93
insula R 42 5 4 5.3 0.000002 89
insula L −33 2 16 5.0 0.000007 69
inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44) R 61 5 10 5.2 0.000003 27
lingual L −9 −58 −8 4.8 0.000011 192
inferior temporal lobe R 36 −19 −5 5.2 0.000003 220
inferior temporal lobe L −33 −1 −11 5.2 0.000003 50

Regions were identified from a whole-brain RFX-GLM analysis [t(55) = 3.59, P < 0.01, FDR corrected). The clusters are described by their hemisphere (H), peak voxel coordinates in Talairach space, the t and P values in the peak voxel and the number of voxels (n).