Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;7:2909. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02750-9

Table 1.

Consistency of performance.

Go stimulus color
Blue Yellow t(26) p
α 0.65 (0.30) 0.61 (0.27) 0.51 0.614
α (surrogate) 1.35 (0.09) 1.34 (0.12) 0.61 0.549
(2 − α)/21 0.67 (0.15) 0.70 (0.13)
γ 0.25 (0.08) 0.26 (0.14) 0.25 0.802
γ (surrogate) 0.05 (0.04) 0.05 (0.04) 0.47 0.644
(1 + γ)/21 0.62 (0.04) 0.63 (0.07)
β 0.72 (0.09) 0.74 (0.10) 0.80 0.432
β (surrogate) 0.56 (0.02) 0.56 (0.02) 0.61 0.546
Omission errors, % 2.35 (4.21) 3.98 (8.58) 1.28 0.212
Commission errors, % 18.64 (11.39) 20.00 (9.61) 0.85 0.403
RTV, ms
 Go 67.67 (19.27) 70.40 (24.82) 0.75 0.458
 NoGo 61.95 (31.17) 54.21 (25.16) 1.12 0.272
MRT, ms
 Go 316.86 321.09 0.71 0.483
 NoGo 273.62 277.68 0.73 0.471

Mean (SD) of the ACF (α), PSD (γ) and DFA (β) scaling exponents and performance measures in the two versions of the Go/NoGo task, with either blue or yellow Gostimulus color. Omissions refer to the non-responded Gostimuli and commissions to responses to NoGostimuli. The t and p values are obtained from paired samples t-tests between the two versions of the task with switched stimulus colors.

1For time series originating from a critical system and exhibiting genuine LRTCs, the ACF (α), PSD (γ) and DFA (β) scaling exponents are theoretically coupled6, 35 by the relationship β = (2 − α)/2 = (1 + γ)/2.