Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 5;18:292. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1701-1

Table 1.

Reconciliation infeasibility in apes data set

Phylogenetic program Trees a Loci b Monophyletic trees c Monophyletic loci d Infeasible e
PHYLIP 76 1394 3 (3.9%) 1115 (80.0%) 35 40.8
BioNJ 6298 125,928 5 (0.1%) 63,013 (50.0%) 366 5.8
PhyML 6297 125,914 46 (0.7%) 80,805 (64.2%) 229 3.6
RAxML 6298 125,928 34 (0.5%) 73,576 (58.4%) 213 3.4

aThe number of gene trees considered for each program. For PHYLIP, since many trees were non-binary, we considered only trees for which we can definitively determine their reconciliation feasibility or infeasibility. In particular, non-binary trees with a reconcilable LEG were not considered. For PHYLIP and PhyML, one tree could not be reconstructed

bThe number of species-specific loci across all trees

cThe number and percentage of trees for which, for every species-specific loci, the genes in that loci were inferred to be monophyletic

dThe number and percentage of species-specific loci for which the genes in that loci were inferred to be monophyletic

eThe number and percentage of trees with infeasible reconciliations