Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;12(6):912–920. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11971116

Table 4.

Relationship between indicated exposure at index visit and subsequent decline of >50% in GFR or initiation of RRT, n=751

Exposure No. No. (%) with Event Regression Modela Relative Time 95% Confidence Interval
Urine protein-to-creatinineb, mg/mg
 <0.139 220 17 (8) GG (3.721,0.935,0.991) 1 (reference)
 0.139–0.630 271 46 (17) GG (3.043,0.935,0.991) 0.51 0.30 to 0.86
 >0.630 260 139 (53) GG (1.662,0.935,0.991) 0.13 0.07 to 0.22
Urine albumin-to-creatinine, mg/g
 <30 220 23 (10) GG (3.469,0.932,0.977) 1 (reference)
 30–300 271 46 (17) GG (3.001,0.932,0.977) 0.63 0.40 to 1.00
 >300 260 133 (51) GG (1.663,0.932,0.977) 0.16 0.10 to 0.26
Urine nonalbumin-to-creatinineb, mg/g
 <86 220 18 (8) GG (3.913,0.336,3.328) 1 (reference)
 86–273 271 49 (18) GG (3.166,0.336,3.328) 0.47 0.27 to 0.84
 >273 260 135 (52) GG (2.065,0.336,3.328) 0.16 0.09 to 0.28

GG, generalized gamma.

a

Includes the location, scale, and shape parameters of the regression model.

b

Cutoffs for urine protein-to-creatinine and urine nonalbumin-to-creatinine were chosen to yield same sample sizes as determined by urine albumin-to-creatinine cutoffs of 30 and 300.