Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;102(4):1227–1236. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3743

Table 3.

Adjusted Associationsa Between PA Levels at ARIC Visit 1 and 25(OH)D at ARIC Visit 2, Stratified by Race

White Race (n = 8201) Black Race (n = 2141)
Relative risk ratio (95% CI)b for deficient 25(OH)D <20 ng/mLd
AHA-defined PA categories
 Poor (reference) Reference (1) Reference (1)
 Intermediate 0.85 (0.76, 0.95) 1.07 (0.93, 1.23)
 Recommended 0.63 (0.56, 0.71) 0.93 (0.80, 1.07)
 METS*min/wk (per 100) 0.96 (0.96, 0.97) 1.00 (0.99, 1.00)
Difference [β coefficient (95% CI)]c in continuous 25(OH)D levelsd
PA levels
 Poor (reference) Reference (0) Reference (0)
 Intermediate 0.79 (0.32, 1.25) −0.28 (−0.97, 0.41)
 Recommended 2.25 (1.83, 2.67) 0.79 (0.09, 1.49)
 METS*min/wk (per 100) 0.15 (0.13, 0.18) 0.05 (0.01, 0.10)

Data in bold type indicate P values for race interaction < 0.001 for all comparisons (PA categories and continuous PA levels).

a

Models are adjusted age, sex, race/center, education, smoking status, alcohol intake, SBP, antihypertensive medication use, diabetes, total and HDL cholesterol levels, use of lipid-lowering medications, eGFR, and BMI.

b

Relative risk ratios for vitamin D deficiency [<20 ng/mL (<50 nmol/L)] vs adequate 25(OH)D by PA levels were derived from Poisson regression models.

c

β coefficients were derived from linear regression models and represent the differences (in ng/mL) in 25(OH)D levels by PA levels.

d

To convert 25(OH)D levels to nmol/L from ng/mL, multiply by 2.496.