Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;7:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.05.020

Table 3.

Results from logistic regression between green areas (1 km and 5 km buffers) and outcome variables (overweight and obesity) based on the Norwegian Youth Study, 2001–2004 (n = 10,527).

Buffer size Least greenness 2 3 4 Most greenness Slope (96% CI)
Unadjusted1
Overweight 1 km 1 (ref) 1.27 (1.11–1.46) 1.60 (1.35–1.88) 1.86 (1.48–2.32) 1.87 (1.42–2.47) 0.01 (0.01–0.01)
Overweight 5 km 1 (ref) 1.68 (1.45–1.93) 1.72 (1.45–2.04) 2.13 (1.71–2.66) 2.41 (1.83–3.17) 0.02 (0.02–0.02)
Obesity 1 km 1 (ref) 1.55 (1.09–2.21) 2.36 (1.59–3.48) 2.66 (1.59–4.45) 2.62 (1.4–4.92) 0.02 (0.02–0.03)
Obesity 5 km 1 (ref) 2.54 (1.77–3.64) 2.54 (1.66–3.89) 3.21 (1.92–5.38) 3.09 (1.59–6.01) 0.04 (0.04–0.05)



Adjusted2
Overweight 1 km 1 (ref) 1.14 (0.99–1.32) 1.35 (1.12–1.62) 1.38 (1.09–1.76) 1.38 (1.02–1.85) 0.01 (0.01–0.01)
Overweight 5 km 1 (ref) 1.55 (1.25–1.94) 1.67 (1.3–2.14) 1.91 (1.44–2.54) 2.01 (1.44–2.81) 0.02 (0.02–0.02)
Obesity 1 km 1 (ref) 1.35 (0.93–1.95) 1.78 (1.15–2.76) 1.65 (0.95–2.88) 1.56 (0.79–3.05) 0.01 (0.01–0.02)
Obesity 5 km 1 (ref) 2.59 (1.47–4.56) 2.55 (1.37–4.76) 2.68 (1.37–5.24) 2.47 (1.1–5.56) 0.04 (0.04–0.05)

In the “unadjusted” model, we adjusted for age, gender, and ethnicity. In the adjusted model, we also adjusted for physical activity, transportation mode, use of nature, social support from friends and family, family situation, diet, smoking habits, county, moving history, and climatic variables (precipitation, altitude, and temperature).