Table 3. Hierarchical Linear Models Predicting Positive Consequences.

	Freshman Year			Sophomore Year
	B (SE)	t	p	B (SE)	t	p
Intercept	3.773 (.139)	27.115	<0.001	3.270 (.130)	25.099	<0.001
L2 Predictors of Intercept
Average drinks per week	0.062 (.018)	3.504	<0.001	0.028 (.014)	2.008	0.045
Depression	0.016 (.011)	1.488	0.137	0.001 (.010)	0.147	0.883
Coping Motives	0.326 (.161)	2.030	0.043	0.536 (.150)	3.577	<0.001
Conformity Motives	0.353 (.159)	2.215	0.027	0.360 (.159)	2.261	0.024
Social Motives	0.325 (.103)	3.165	0.002	0.419 (.117)	3.596	<0.001
Enhancement Motives	0.181 (.096)	1.881	0.060	0.222 (.116)	1.905	0.057
Depression × Coping Motives	-0.015 (.011)	-1.491	0.136	-0.038 (.012)	-3.220	0.001
Quarterly Drinks (L1)	0.130 (.012)	10.766	<0.001	0.108 (.011)	10.025	<0.001
Slope of Pos Cons over Time (L1)	-0.433 (.035)	-12.257	<0.001	-0.211 (.032)	-6.494	<0.001
L2 Predictors of Slope of Pos Cons over Time
Depression	-0.005 (.005)	-1.009	0.313	0.003 (.004)	0.669	0.504
Coping Motives	-0.067 (.070)	-0.965	0.335	0.023 (.055)	0.410	0.682
Conformity Motives	-0.001 (.064)	-0.022	0.982	0.010 (.062)	0.158	0.874
Social Motives	0.010 (.047)	0.207	0.836	-0.087 (.052)	-1.694	0.090
Enhancement Motives	-0.078 (.041)	-1.916	0.056	0.080 (.050)	1.610	0.108

Note. Pos Cons = positive consequences, L1 = Level 1, L2=Level