Table 3. Results of a multivariate logistic regression model with presence of HER-positive CTCs (yes/no) as binary response variable (n = 248 patients; 10 patients were excluded from the multivariate analysis because of missing values).
Clinical variable at baseline | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
pT | 0.370 | ||
pT2 vs. pT1 | 0.15 | 0.67–1.98 | 0.612 |
pT3 vs. pT1 | 2.26 | 0.44–11.58 | 0.328 |
pT4 vs. pT1 | 0.21 | 0.02–2.03 | 0.177 |
pN | 0.541 | ||
pN+ vs pN0 | 0.85 | 0.49–1.45 | 0.541 |
Histology | 0.036 | ||
lobular vs. ductal | 0.41 | 0.10–1.75 | 0.229 |
other vs. ductal | 1.73 | 1.00–3.01 | 0.052 |
Grading | 0.913 | ||
G2 vs. G1 | 0.73 | 0.04–14.24 | 0.835 |
G3 vs. G1 | 0.66 | 0.03–12.92 | 0.782 |
ER status | 0.710 | ||
positive vs. negative | 1.16 | 0.53–2.52 | 0.710 |
PR status | 0.337 | ||
positive vs. negative | 0.69 | 0.32–1.48 | 0.337 |
Menopause | 0.087 | ||
post- vs. pre- menopausal | 0.47 | 0.20–1.12 | 0.087 |
Age (years) | 0.634 | ||
≥ 50 vs. < 50 | 1.23 | 0.52–2.92 | 0.634 |
Chemotherapy | 0.166 | ||
FEC-D vs. FEC-DG | 0.686 | 0.40–1.17 | 0.166 |
FEC-DG = epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamide/gemcitabine-docetaxel chemotherapy
FEC-D = epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamide docetaxel (D) chemotherapy