Table 1. Inclusion criteria for systematic review and rationale.
Criteria | Rationale |
---|---|
Child Care Type | |
Only studies that examined the impact of the quality of centre-based programs on children’s outcomes were included. Centre-based programs included daycare and preschool programs, nursery schools, pre-kindergarten programs, and Head Start programs. Studies that only examined home-based child care, or those in which home-based and centre-based could not be separated were excluded. | Center-based child care settings differ from home daycare in many ways such as ratios, group size, physical environment, curriculum, age range of children, and caregiver qualifications. As a result, quality is often measured differently for these two settings (e.g., ECERS versus FCCERS). |
Age Served | |
Studies that included preschool-aged children as the majority of participants were included. For the purposes of the meta-analysis, preschool-age was defined as ranging from 30 to 72 months. | Preschool-aged classrooms are different from infant/toddler classrooms due to the developmental stage and needs of the children in these two age groups. As a result, regulations and standards of care (e.g., ratios, physical environment, etc.) as well as daily activities (e.g., curriculum) differ between infant/toddler and preschool-aged classrooms. |
Child Outcomes | |
Studies that provided information about the association between ECERS/ECERS-R on children’s cognitive, academic, social-emotional, health, or motor outcomes were included. Data could have been gathered from teachers, parents, and/or children themselves. Measures that focus on dyads (e.g., attachment) were excluded. | Cognitive, academic, social-emotional, health, and motor outcomes were selected because they are key predictors of children’s developmental trajectories. Measures that focus on staff-child or peer dyads were not included given that these outcomes often reflect an aspect of child care quality. |
Study Design | |
Cross-sectional and longitudinal designs were included. When multiple child outcome assessments were reported the earliest time-point following the measurement of quality were extracted. | To increase the homogeneity across the extracted data from eligible studies (i.e., increase the likelihood of meta-analysis), we focused on the earliest time-point in which child outcomes were measured following the measurement of quality in instances where multiple waves of outcome data were presented. |
Outcome Reporting | |
Studies must have presented statistical data quantifying the association between ECERS/ECERS-R and a child outcome measure. | Studies only reporting qualitative results were not considered for this review as the domains of assessment could vary markedly between studies. |
Language | |
To be extracted studies had to be in English. | We did not have resources to systematically translate material written in other languages. |
Abbreviations: ECERS = Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale; FCCERS Family Child Care Environment Rating Scale.