Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2017 Mar 16;112(7):1210–1219. doi: 10.1111/add.13789

Table 3.

Comparison of unweighted (RCT sample effect) and weighted (population effect) odds ratios of treatment effect on urine toxicology

Urine toxicology
OR 95%CI p Comparison of the effect estimates from the unweighted and weighted models
CTN1
Unweighted 8.22 3.26 20.72 <.01
Weighted 8.26 1.43 47.76 .02 F(1, 225)=0.00, p=.99
CTN2
Unweighted 10.80 2.52 46.21 <.01
Weighted 59.76 10.89 327.87 <.01 F(1, 459)=2.24, p=.13
CTN3
Unweighted 1.84 1.28 2.64 <.01
Weighted 1.36 0.54 3.43 .52 F(1, 1031)=0.36, p=.55
CTN4
Unweighted 1.11 0.77 1.60 .59
Weighted 1.32 0.54 3.26 .54 F(1, 921)=0.13, p=.72
CTN5
Unweighted 1.18 0.80 1.72 .40
Weighted 1.79 0.80 3.99 .15 F(1, 845)=0.87, p=.35
CTN6
Unweighted 1.48 0.99 2.20 .05
Weighted 1.13 0.56 2.28 .74 F(1, 907)=0.44, p=.51
CTN7
Unweighted 0.87 0.51 1.49 .62
Weighted 0.48 0.13 1.82 .28 F(1, 771)=0.65, p=.42
CTN10
Unweighted 5.55 2.71 11.36 <.01
Weighted 4.71 0.29 76.54 .28 F(1, 307)=0.01, p=.91
CTN13
Unweighted 0.72 0.41 1.25 .24
Weighted 1.38 0.36 5.21 .64 F(1, 399)=0.78, p=.38
CTN30
Unweighted 0.72 0.41 1.25 .24
Weighted 1.38 0.36 5.21 .64 F(1, 1305)=0.00, p=.97