Skip to main content
. 2017 May 1;28(6):760–773. doi: 10.1177/0956797617694865

Table 1.

Model Comparisons of the Multilevel Models Predicting Key Outcomes

Outcome variable and statistic Model 1:
null model
Model 2:
covariates only
Model 3:
lab-level PABs regarding science added
Model 4:
participant’s ethnicity added
Individual-level PABs about science
 Model deviance 1,634.32 855.9 848.31 832.27
 Likelihood ratio test χ2(3) = 778.09, p < .001 χ2(1) = 7.58, p = .006 χ2(7) = 16.03, p = .025
Experience of interest in research
 Model deviance 1,828.53 1,015.97 1,009.54 987.8
 Likelihood ratio test χ2(3) = 813.53, p < .001 χ2(1) = 6.42, p = .011 χ2(11) = 21.65, p = .003
Interest in a science career
 Model deviance 2,574.32 1,311.93 1,308.06 1,250.61
 Likelihood ratio test χ2(7) = 1,262.39, p < .001 χ2(1) = 3.87, p = .046 χ2(13) = 57.44, p < .001

Note: The table presents results of likelihood ratio tests comparing Models 2, 3, and 4 with the immediately preceding models (i.e., thereby testing the efficacy of adding new parameters). Model 1 included 3 parameters for predicting each outcome. Models 2, 3, and 4 included 6, 7, and 14 parameters, respectively, for predicting individual-level prosocial-affordance beliefs (PABs) about science and experience of interest in research. Models 2, 3, and 4 included 10, 11, and 24 parameters, respectively, for predicting interest in a science career.