Skip to main content
. 2017 May 1;28(6):760–773. doi: 10.1177/0956797617694865

Table 4.

Results From the Multilevel Model Using Lab Mates’ Prosocial-Affordance Beliefs (PABs) Regarding Science to Predict Experience of Interest in Research: Fixed Effects

Fixed effect Unstandardized regression coefficient 95% confidence interval t p
Experience of interest in research
URM mean, γ00 6.07 [5.92, 6.20] t(33) = 81.23 < .001
URM lab-level PABs regarding science, γ01 0.55 [0.27, 0.83] t(33) = 3.86 < .001
Individual-level PABs regarding science: mean, γ10 0.42 [0.26, 0.58] t(34) = 5.21 < .001
White: mean, γ20 −0.30 [−0.58, –0.02] t(33) = −2.07 .036
White: lab-level PABs regarding science, γ21 −0.56 [−1.06, –0.06] t(33) = −2.19 .041
Asian: mean, γ30 −0.27 [−0.49, –0.05] t(33) = −2.33 .029
Asian: lab-level PABs regarding science, γ31 −0.10 [−0.50, 0.30] t(33) = −0.48 .539

Note: Ethnicity was dummy-coded (0 = underrepresented-minority student, and 1 = White or Asian, depending on the variable). URM = underrepresented-minority student.