Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 7;33(1):81–94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki148

Figure 2.

Figure 2

T1/2 is dependent on the temperature gradient, not on strand concentration. (A) Normalized melting profiles recorded at 240 nm of the preformed d-(TG4T)4 quadruplex (20 μM strand concentration) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) with 0.11 M NaCl at four different heating rates (circles: 0.054; crosses: 0.107; squares: 0.26 and triangles 0.4°C/min). (B) T1/2 of the d-(TG4T)4 quadruplex as a function of the average temperature gradient. Note that the ‘true’ equilibrium Tm, which would be obtained with an infinitely slow gradient is calculated to be below 30°C. T1/2 is provided with a 0.5°C accuracy. (C) Melting and cooling profiles recorded at 295 nm of the preformed d-(TG4T)4 quadruplex in 10 mM lithium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) with 0.11 M NaCl at two different strand concentrations (20 μM: circles and 200 μM: squares. y-scale values shown on the left and right axis, respectively. 1 cm pathway cuvette for 20 μM, 0.2 cm for 200 μM). Thermal gradient: 0.24°C/min. (D) Dependence of the T1/2 value (obtained upon heating at a rate of 0.24°C/min) of the preformed d(TG4T)4 quadruplex (5–200 μM strand concentration) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) with 0.11 M NaCl.