Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 8;2016(11):CD006417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006417.pub3

Comparison 2. Incentive‐based interventions versus no intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 HIV prevalence 2 3805 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.23 [0.51, 2.96]
1.1 HIV prevalence young women 2 2489 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.36, 3.89]
1.2 HIV prevalence young men 1 1316 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.96 [0.18, 21.07]
2 HSV2 prevalence 2 7229 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.72, 1.36]
2.1 HSV2 prevalence young women 2 4089 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.64 [0.18, 2.23]
2.2 HSV2 prevalence young men 1 3140 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.85, 1.39]
3 Syphilis prevalence 1 1291 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.41 [0.05, 3.27]
3.1 Syphillis prevalence young women 1 1291 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.41 [0.05, 3.27]
4 Pregnancy prevalence (short‐term) 2 4200 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.58, 0.99]
5 Pregnancy prevalence (long‐term) 1 2891 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.73, 1.08]
6 Self‐reported sexual debut 2 7177 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.73, 0.95]
6.1 Young women 1 1016 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.41, 1.13]
6.2 Self‐reported sexual debut young women and young men 1 6161 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.74, 0.97]
7 Self‐reported use of condom at last sex 1 4265 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.12]
7.1 Used condom at last sex women and men 1 4265 Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.12]