Table 4. Quality of the reporting of the results using the STROBE checklist.
First author | Design | Score | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lecker, 2012 | CSS | (13.3/22) 60.45 % |
2 | Pardo, 2014 | CSS | (12.2/22) 55.45 % |
3 | Hofmann, 2014 | CSS | (15.6/22) 70.9 % |
4 | Ijiri, 2015b | CSS | (13.5/22) 61.36% |
5 | Jedrychowski 2015 | CSS | (12/22) 54.45 % |
6 | Kwaśniewska, 2016 | CSS | (15/22) 68.1 % |
7 | Moreno, 2015 | CSS | (12.5/22) 56.81 % |
8 | Palermo, 2015 | CSS | (13.5/22) 61.36 % |
9 | Al-Daghri, 2015 | CSS | (12.8/22) 58.18 % |
STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology; CSS: Cross-sectional study.