Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2017 Jan 24;79(3):705–722. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12392

Table 5.

Individual Fixed-Effects Models Stratified by Income Tertiles, Race/Ethnicity and Relationship Status

Any Hardship Hardship Domains

Logit OLS

β(SE) OR β(SE) OR β(SE) OR β(SE) β(SE) β(SE)
Income Tertiles

Bottom Middle Top Bottom Middle Top
Gave PFT 0.49** (0.11) 1.59 0.12 (0.10) 1.07 0.17 (0.11) 1.15 0.20** (0.05) 0.01 (0.05) −0.04 (0.03)
Observations 2,892 3,196 2,265 5,113 5,329 5,377
Number of individuals 796 868 607 1,527 1,537 1,536

Race/Ethnicity

Black Hispanic White Black Hispanic White
Gave PFT 0.32** (0.08) 1.38 0.22+ (0.13) 1.24 0.09 (0.16) 1.09 0.08* (0.04) 0.07 (0.06) −0.00 (0.05)
Observations 4,565 2,158 1,360 7,695 4,133 3,406
Number of individuals 1,233 598 367 2,196 1,255 970

Relationship Status

Married Cohabiting Single Married Cohabiting Single
Gave PFT −0.07 (0.15) 0.94 0.17+ (0.10) 1.18 0.45** (0.09) 1.57 −0.06 (0.04) 0.03 (0.05) 0.15** (0.04)
Observations 1,453 3,250 3,641 3,873 5,730 6,210
Number of individuals 391 883 995 1,122 1,680 1,798

Note: All models include individual fixed-effects, time and social support. The income tertile models also include relationship status, the race/ethnic models include relationship status and income, the relationship models include income.

Chow tests find that the bottom income quintile is significantly different (p<0.05) from the middle and top quintiles. No differences by race/ethnicity are statistically significant. Cohabiting and single results are statistically different from married results.

**

p<0.01,

*

p<0.05,

+

p<0.1