Figure 10.
Similar parameterization of stomatal conductance models results in similar global simulations. The comparison of global simulations was as in Figure 9, except that instead of using a single mean g1 value of 9 for simulations with the BB stomatal conductance model, different plant types were assigned individual values for g1, derived from the g1M values for those plant types using Equation 5 (Table II). This further improved the similarity between CLM4.5 simulations using either the BB or MED stomatal conductance model.