Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 7;96(6):1404–1414. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0170

Table 3.

Variation in detection of enteric pathogens in stool with neighborhood and hygiene status*

Any enteric pathogen Campylobacter spp. Giardia spp. Pathogenic Escherichia coli
PR (95% CI) P value PR (95% CI) P value PR (95% CI) P value PR (95% CI) P value
Neighborhood: Old Town 1.32 (0.50, 3.49) 0.57 1.91 (0.71, 5.14) 0.18 1.56 (0.48, 6.46) 0.45 0.73 (0.14, 3.78) 0.64
Poor hygiene 1.97 (0.75, 5.62) 0.17 3.42 (1.30, 12.3) 0.02 1.69, (0.53, 7.27) 0.39 0.55 (0.07, 3.37) 0.34
Neighborhood: Old Town 1.37 (0.51, 3.72) 0.53 2.15 (0.80, 5.97) 0.13 1.60 (0.49, 6.78) 0.47 0.70 (0.11, 5.02) 0.56
Poor hygiene 2.01 (0.76, 5.77) 0.16 3.61 (1.37, 11.4) 0.01 1.72 (0.54, 7.57) 0.54 0.53 (0.09, 4.10) 0.31

CI = confidence interval; PR = prevalence ratio for detection of enteric pathogen in stool specimen.

*

N = 76 children from which stool specimens were collected (43 in Chinnallapuram, 33 in Old Town). Enteric pathogens detected in stool specimens included astrovirus, Campylobacter spp., Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia spp., genotype II norovirus, and pathogenic E. coli. A full list of organisms tested in stool specimens is presented in Houpt and others.29 Only pathogens detected in > 20% of stool specimens were regressed against neighborhood and hygiene status.

Enteroaggregative E. coli, enterohemorrhagic E. coli, enteropathogenic E. coli, and enterotoxigenic E. coli.