Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 6;2:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2016.03.001

Table 1.

Overview of the selected publications. The columns depict; first author, year of publication, country where the study was performed, study category, occupational exposure (YES/NO, YES versus NO) with N: number of people exposed, micro-organism studied, livestock involved if (YES): animals are screened for a micro-organism, description of the people involved, main study conclusion, reference number. There are three study categories; seroepidemiology reports on studies where blood samples were analysed for specific disease markers, risk analyses reports on specific risk factors for acquiring a micro-organism and source attribution, studies where the source of specific micro-organism is identified after human cases or carriage of the specified micro-organism. For occupational exposure (YES or NO) the number of either occupational exposed, non-occupational exposed or occupational versus non-occupational exposed people are given. The column with the description of people includes occupations and when available also descriptions of control groups.

Author Year Country Study category Occupational exposure (N =) Micro-organism Animals involved (screened?) People involved Main outcomes Reference number
Al-Ani 2004 Jordan Risk analyses YES vs. NO (100 vs. 800) Brucella spp. Sheep, goats (YES) Vetsa, sheepherders, lab technicians More Brucella seroprevalence in human high risk group [85]
Bos 2010 Netherlands Source attribution YES (872) H7N7 Avian Influenza Turkeys, layers, broilers Cullers, cleaners, biosecurity managers High infection probability for exposure infected poultry [39]
Bosnjak 2010 Denmark Seroepidemiology YES (359) Coxiella burnetii Cattle Farmers, vetsa, inseminators, Hoof-trimmers 34% in vets seroconverted for C. burnetti, 11% others [40]
Buxton-Bridges 2002 Hong Kong Seroepidemiology YES (1525/293) H5N1 Avian Influenza Poultry Poultry workers, government workers (cullers) More poultry related tasks, more anti-H5 seropositivity [61]
Castillo-Neyra 2014 USA, NC Risk analyses YES vs. NO (162 vs. 63, 111) MRSA, MDRSAb Pigs Processing plant workers, family, residents Processing workers, more MRSA, MDR-SA, than controls [51]
De Marco 2013 Italy Risk analyses YES vs. NO (123 vs. 379) Swine Influenza H1N1pandemicc, H1N1swined Pigs Swine workers, Non-exposed controls Exposure H1N1sw gives cross-immunity for H1N1pdm [63]
De Rooij 2012 Netherlands Seroepidemiology YES (674) Coxiella burnetii “Farm animals”k Veterinary medicine students 18,7% of vet. Students seroconverted for C. burnetii [41]
Di Trani 2012 Italy Risk analyses YES vs. NO (188 vs. 379) H5 and H7 Avian Influenza Poultry Poultry workers, Non-exposed controls Poultry workers more H7-AB positive, than controls [60]
Dickx 2010 Belgium Seroepidemiology YES (53, 38) Chlamydophila psittaci Chickens, turkeys Chicken and turkey slaughterhouse workers Live animal contact risk, for C. psittaci seropositivity [24]
Gaede 2008 Germany Source attribution YES (24) Chlamydophila psittaci Poultry (YES) Poultry owners Genotype C. psittaci similar in poultry and humans [101]
Geenen 2013 Netherlands Source attribution YES (145) MRSA Broilers (YES) Workers and residents poultry farm People on MRSA positive farms, also MRSA carriers [72]
Gilbert 2011 Netherlands Source attribution YES (341) MRSA Pigs (YES) Pig slaughterhouse workers Working with live animals, risk for human MRSA carriage [21]
Gilpin 2008 New-Zealand Source attribution YES and NO (7) Campylobacter spp. Cattle (YES) Dairy workers, resident children Cattle found Campylobacter positive, after human cases [102]
Gordoncillo 2011 USA, MI Source attribution NO MRSA Pigs (YES) Hobby pig owners Matched hobby pig farmers-pigs not both MRSA carriers [73]
Graveland 2011 Netherlands Seroepidemiology YES (155) MRSA Veal calves Veal calve farmers Human MRSA carriage, reduced when cattle was absent [19]
Gray 2008 USA, IA Risk analyses YES vs. NO (385 vs. 418, 66) Avian Influenza Poultry Agricultural workers, University controls Avian Influenza seropositivity in poultry workers [58]
Gummow 2003 South-Africa Interview study YES (88) All zoonotic diseases “Farm animals”k University employed vetsa Wide range of zoonoses reported by vets in their career [20]
Hackert 2012 Netherlands Risk analyses YES vs. NO (26, 50, 14 vs. 253) Coxiella burnetii Goats Farm residents/workers, visitors, household contacts Seroconversion C. burnetii related to farm distance [25]
Helmy 2013 Egypt Source attribution NO (165) Cryptosporidium parvum Cattle, buffalo (YES) Farm children LA-Cryptosporidium related to children's diarrhoea cases [18]
Hoek 2008 United Kingdom Source attribution NO (20) Cryptosporidium parvum Sheep (YES) Students and teachers camping on a farm No pathway found for farm visit C. parvum infections [93]
Huijbers 2013 Netherlands Risk analyses NO (1025) ESBLl-Enterobacteriaceae Poultry Residents in a high and low poultry density area 5.1% ESBL-positive, lower risk ESBL carriage near poultry [98]
Huijsdens 2006 Netherlands Risk analyses YES vs. NO (3 vs. 3) MRSA Pigs Farmworkers and family members Molecular analyses link human MRSA to pigs [64]
Huo 2012 China (Jiangsu) Seroepidemiology YES (306) H5N1 Avian Influenza Poultry Poultry workers Poultry workers seropositive for Avian Influenza [86]
Kandeel 2010 Egypt Seroepidemiology NO (6355) H5N1 Avian Influenza Poultry All people having AI symptoms Avian Influenza risk factors: rearing, slaughtering poultry [80]
Kayali 2011 USA Risk analyses YES vs. NO (57, 38 vs. 82) Avian Metapneumovirus Turkeys Turkey growers and processing workers, controls Turkey slaughters Avian Metapneumo virus positive [53]
Koopmans 2004 Netherlands Seroepidemiology YES (453) H7N7 Avian Influenza Poultry Poultry farmers, farmworkers, family Cullers and contacts seropositive for H7-antibodies [46]
Köck 2012 Germany Source attribution YES (35) MRSA ST398 Pigs Pig farmers 59% farmers still MRSA carriers after holidays [71]
Krumbholtz 2012 Germany Risk analyses YES vs. NO (24, 14, 46, 22 vs. 116) Hepatitis E virus Pigs Slaughterers, meat inspectors, farmers, vetsa, controls Slaughterhouse workers more positive HEV antibodies [52]
Leibler 2010 USA (MD, VA) Risk analyses YES vs. NO (24 vs. 75) Avian Influenza Poultry Poultry workers, agricultural community members No seropositivity Avian Influenza in US poultry workers [57]
Liu 2008 China (Pearl river delta) Descriptive study n.a. Avian Influenza, not focuse Chickens, turkeys Chicken owners No epidemiology, overview poultry practises China [16]
Lohiniva 2012 Egypt Risk analyses n.a. H5N1 Avian Influenza Poultry Households with chickens Overview post outbreak measures on poultry practises [17]
López-Robles 2012 Mexico Risk analyses YES vs. NO (62 vs. 63) Swine Influenza Pigs Swine workers, non-exposed controls Swine workers compared with general public [62]
Lyytikäinen 1998 Germany Seroepidemiology NO (239) Coxiella burnetii Sheep All residents in a specific rural area Specific sheep flock linked to human Q-fever cases [99]
Manfredi-Selvaggi 1996 Italy Seroepidemiology NO (58) Coxiella burnetii Sheep All residents in a specific rural area Passing sheep flock causes human Q-fever outbreak [100]
Meader 2009 United Kingdom Seroepidemiology YES (413) Hepatitis E virus Cat, chicken, deer, goat, horse, pig, sheep UK Farmers Cohort Animal contact risk factor HEV, pigs not specific [56]
Milne 1999 United Kingdom Source attribution NO (3) VTEC 0157fEscherichia coli Goats, cattle (YES) Children visiting recreational educational farm Outbreak E. coli O157 linked to public accessible farm [91]
Ming 2006 China Source attribution YES (100 exposed, 30 infected) Trichophyton verrucosum Cattle (YES) Animal workers Cattle and farm workers infected with T. verrucosum [87]
Monno 2009 South-Italy Risk analyses YES vs. NO (128 vs. 280) Coxiella burnetii, Leptospira spp., Brucella spp. “Farm animals”k Animal workers, vets*, blood donors C. burnetii seroconversion found in Animal workers [55]
Morgan 2009 United Kingdom Seroepidemiology YES (142) H7N3 Avian Influenza Poultry People in contact with live or death infected animals Incomplete PPE, resulted in significant infection risk [45]
Mulders 2010 Netherlands Source attribution YES (466) MRSA Poultry (YES) Poultry slaughterhouse personal Working with live animals, risk for human MRSA carriage [23]
Myers 2006 USA Risk analyses YES vs. NO (111, 97, 65 vs. 79) Swine Influenza Pigs Farmers, meat processing workers, vetsa, controls More SI seroprevalence in work-exposed, than controls [49]
Okoye 2013 Nigeria Risk analyses YES vs. NO (316 vs. 54) Avian Influenza Poultry Farmers, open market workers, controls No risk factor identified for Avian Influenza transmission [83]
Oppliger 2012 West-Switzerland Source attribution YES (67, 8) MRSA Pigs (YES) Pig farmers, vetsa Pig and farmer/vet MRSA similar serotypes [67]
Ortiz 2006 Nigeria (Kano) Seroepidemiology YES (295, 25) H5N1 Avian Influenza Poultry Poultry workers, laboratory workers No serological evidence for H5N1 infections identified [82]
Osadebe 2012 USA (CT) Source attribution YES MRSA Pigs (YES) Pig farmers Pigs carried human MRSA serotypes, possible anthroponosis [74]
Padungtod 2005 North-Thailand Source attribution YES and NO (197, 4 and 100, 205) Campylobacter Chickens, pigs, dairy cattle (YES) Farm staff, slaughterers, community, diarrhoea patients Campylobacter found in food animals and environments [111]
Petersen 2012 Denmark Seroepidemiology NO MRSA mecC gene positiveg Cattle, sheep All MRSA samples from national databank Cattle/sheep contact, possible risk factor mecC MRSA [97]
Pletinckx 2012 Belgium Source attribution YES and NO (10, 10 and 13) MRSA ST398h Pigs, poultry, cattle, dogs, cats, rodents (YES) Farmers, vetsa, family members of farmers Farms LA-MRSA positive, environment, humans, animals [65]
Puzelli 2005 Italy Seroepidemiology YES (983) Avian Influenza; H7N1 HPAIi, H7N3 LPAIj Poultry Poultry workers Poultry workers H7N3 seropositive,after avian outbreak [59]
Rabinowitz 2012 Egypt Source attribution n.a. H5N1 Avian Influenza Poultry, wild birds All H5N1 confirmed human cases Comparison animal and human H5N1 data bases [84]
Radon 2007 Germany Source attribution NO (2425) n.a. “Farm animals”k Neighbours confined animal feeding operations (CAFO) Adverse-health effects residents with CAFO < 500 m home [94]
Schimmer 2012 Netherlands Seroepidemiology YES (268) Coxiella burnetii Goats People living or working on dairy goat farms C. burnetii seroconversion in farmers, spouses, children [54]
Schulze 2011 Germany Source attribution NO (457) n.a. “Farm animals”k Non-farm residents NH3 as proxy for exposure from CAFOs to residents [95]
Scott 2005 USA Source attribution YES and NO (472) Antibiotic Resistant Escherichia coli Pigs (YES) Consumers, pig workers, slaughter-plant workers No similarity E. coli resistance profiles, pigs and humans [50]
Siwila 2007 Zambia Source attribution YES (82, 207) Cryptosporidium parvum Cattle (YES) Farm workers, household members Similar Cryptosporidium found in humans and calves [81]
Skowronski 2007 Canada Seroepidemiology YES (167) H7N3 Avian Influenza Poultry Cullers, farmers, family members PPE should be combined with vaccination, prophylaxis [44]
Smit 2012 Netherlands Risk analyses NO (95,548) Coxiella burnetii Goats, poultry Residents, general practitioners data Poultry risk for pneumonia, goats risk for Q-fever [26]
Spohr 2011 SW-Germany Source attribution YES (9) MRSA Cattle, pigs (YES) People working on cattle farms MRSA found in every section of the farm and on farmers [69]
Te Beest 2011 Netherlands Source attribution YES H7N7 Avian Influenza Poultry (YES) People that visited farms during on H7N7 AI outbreak Humans act as vector for H7N7 between poultry farms [47]
Thorson 2006 Vietnam Source attribution NO (45,478) Avian Influenza Poultry All residents in a specific rural area Flu-like symptoms linked to handling live, death poultry [77]
Tissot-Dupont 2005 France Source attribution NO (85) Coxiella burnetii Sheep All people positive for IgG or IgM against C. burnetii Specific pedagogical farm source Q-fever outbreak [28]
Trevena 1999 United Kingdom Source attribution YES and NO (69) VTEC 0157fEscherichia coli Cattle, pony, dog (YES) People working, living or visiting a farm VTEC O157 infections after animal contact, food products [92]
Uzel 2005 Turkey Risk analyses NO (9) Orf virus Sheep, goat People illegally slaughtering animals Sheep/goat related Orf cases, after feast-of-sacrifice [90]
Van Cleef 2010 Netherlands Risk analyses YES vs. NO (49 vs. 534) MRSA ST398h Pigs People living or working on farms, non-farm residents MRSA ST398 in farm population (26.5%), controls (0.2%) [96]
Van Cleef 2011 Netherlands Risk analyses YES (40) MRSA Veal calves Fieldworkers Short MRSA exposure leads to carriage, cleared after 24 h [66]
Van Cleef 2010 Netherlands Risk analyses YES (249) MRSA Pigs Pig slaughterhouse workers Working with live animals, risk for human MRSA carriage [22]
Van den Broek 2009 Netherlands Source attribution YES (50, 171, 11) MRSA Pigs (YES) Farmers, family, farm workers Only human MRSA carriage on farms with positive pigs [70]
Van der Hoek 2011 Netherlands Risk analyses n.a. Coxiella burnetii Goats, sheep, cattle All residents in a specific rural area Protective factors human Q-fever; vegetation, moist soil [120]
Van Duijkeren 2010 Netherlands Source attribution YES vs. NO (61, 106 vs. 64) MRSA ST398h Horses (YES) Veterinary teaching hospital staff and students Vet. students, staff and horses carried same MRSA ST398 [43]
Van Kerkhove 2008 Cambodia Risk analyses NO (3600) H5N1 Avian Influenza Poultry Households with chickens Model H5N1 risks, poultry contact as transmission proxy [78]
Verkade 2013 Netherlands Risk analyses YES (137) MRSA ST398h Pigs, veal calves Livestock vetsa Veterinarians often (persistent-) carriers MRSA ST398 [42]
Wang 2014 Australia, Cambodia Source attribution YES vs. NO (36 vs. 210) Blastocystis Pigs (YES) Pig farm workers (Australia), Village people (Cambodia) Blastocystis zoonotic Australia, non-zoonotic Cambodia [76]
Whelan 2011 Netherlands Seroepidemiology YES (517 ≥ 246) Coxiella burnetii Goat, sheep Culling workers Exposure-response like seroconversion for C. burnetii [48]
Wong 2012 USA (PA) Seroepidemiology NO (127) H3N2 Swine Influenza Pigs Members of an agricultural club Closeness contact pigs determines H3N2 seropositivity [27]
Wulf 2011 Netherlands Risk analyses YES and NO (640) MRSA ST398h Pigs, veal calves Study on screening data for MRSA Work related LA-MRSA infections increased over years [68]

n.a.: Not applicable

a

Veterinarians.

b

Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

c

H1N1 2009 pandemic Influenza strain.

d

H1N1 swine Influenza strain.

e

The focus in this study was on poultry keeping practises, Avian Influenza was only briefly mentioned and therefore not the focus of the study.

f

Verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli, strain O157.

g

Specific livestock related S. aureus resistance gene.

h

Sequence Type 398, livestock derived S. aureus substrain.

i

High pathogenic Avian Influenza.

j

Low pathogenic Avian Influenza.

k

Livestock types not specified, all farm animals included to the study.

l

Extended-Spectrum-β-lactamase producing.