Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;29(5):914–920. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.914

Table 3. Results of logistic regression analysis for adverse events (n=140).

IADL decline
(Non-decline=0, Decline=1)
Multiple falls
(Non-faller=0, Faller=1)


Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Model χ2 test p=0.061 p=0.031 p=0.075 p=0.007

ORs (95% CI) ORs (95% CI) ORs (95% CI) ORs (95% CI)

Age 1.063
(0.972–1.162)
1.047
(0.955–1.148)
1.010
(0.921–1.107)
0.980
(0.888–1.082)

Gender
(Male=0, Female=1)
1.661
(0.529–5.213)
1.876
(0.587–5.993)
3.184
(0.954–10.627)
3.987*
(1.130–14.071)

BI 0.852
(0.716–1.015)
- 0.846
(0.701–1.021)
-

FIDS - 0.745*
(0.568–0.978)
- 0.657**
(0.489–0.883)

% correct classifications - 88.6 - 91.4

Model 1 includes age, gender, and BI as independent variables; Model 2 includes age, gender, and FIDS as independent variables. IADL: instrumental activities of daily living; ORs: odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; BI: Barthel index; FIDS: Functional Independence and Difficulty Scale. *p<0.05, **p<0.01