Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Jun 7;7:2949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02399-4

Distinct Biological Potential of Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus sanguinis Revealed by Comparative Genome Analysis

Wenning Zheng 2, Mui Fern Tan 2, Lesley A Old 4, Ian C Paterson 2,3, Nicholas S Jakubovics 4,5,, Siew Woh Choo 1,2,
PMCID: PMC5462765  PMID: 28592797

Abstract

Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus sanguinis are pioneer colonizers of dental plaque and important agents of bacterial infective endocarditis (IE). To gain a greater understanding of these two closely related species, we performed comparative analyses on 14 new S. gordonii and 5 S. sanguinis strains using various bioinformatics approaches. We revealed S. gordonii and S. sanguinis harbor open pan-genomes and share generally high sequence homology and number of core genes including virulence genes. However, we observed subtle differences in genomic islands and prophages between the species. Comparative pathogenomics analysis identified S. sanguinis strains have genes encoding IgA proteases, mitogenic factor deoxyribonucleases, nickel/cobalt uptake and cobalamin biosynthesis. On the contrary, genomic islands of S. gordonii strains contain additional copies of comCDE quorum-sensing system components involved in genetic competence. Two distinct polysaccharide locus architectures were identified, one of which was exclusively present in S. gordonii strains. The first evidence of genes encoding the CylA and CylB system by the α-haemolytic S. gordonii is presented. This study provides new insights into the genetic distinctions between S. gordonii and S. sanguinis, which yields understanding of tooth surfaces colonization and contributions to dental plaque formation, as well as their potential roles in the pathogenesis of IE.

Introduction

Oral streptococci including Streptococcus gordonii (Sg) and Streptococcus sanguinis (Ss), are among the most common colonizers of oral biofilms on tooth surfaces, known as dental plaque1. Sg and Ss have the capacity to attach to components of the salivary pellicle, as well as to other oral bacteria through a broad range of adhesin proteins that are expressed on the cell surface2. These interactions are thought to be instrumental in the initiation and progression of dental plaque formation. In addition, Sg and Ss are able to invade the bloodstream and are important causative agents of the rare, but life-threatening disease bacterial infective endocarditis (IE)3. These α-hemolytic oral streptococci have also been identified recently in neutropaenic bloodstream infections4.

Originally, Sg and Ss were considered to be the same species, ‘S. sanguis’. Despite sharing approximately 97% sequence identity across the 16S rRNA gene, they were recognized as distinct species in 1989, on the basis of biochemical, physiological and serological profiles5. In particular, almost all Sg strains utilize amygdalin, produce α-D-glucosidase, β-mannosidase and α-L-fucosidase, and have strong alkaline phosphatase activity, whereas these characteristics are rare in Ss. On the other hand, Ss strains produce IgA protease, which is not present in Sg. More recent phylogenomic analysis indicates that Sg and Ss form a group that is separate from other streptococci but is closely related to the ‘S. sinensis’ clade containing the species S. oligofermentans, S. sinensis and S. cristatus 6. Within the mouth, Sg and Ss appear to share the same habitat, and are both found predominantly on tooth surfaces, either above or below the gumline7. There is some evidence that the two species may play distinct roles in oral health and disease. For example, increased levels of Ss, but not Sg, have been associated with periodontal health8, 9. The associations with dental caries are more complex, and different studies have shown different associations. Nevertheless, there appear to be some differences between levels of Ss and Sg in health versus disease1. For example, Ss is almost always found more frequently or in higher numbers than Sg7. It is not clear how Sg survives as a species, even though it is apparently not as well adapted for growth in dental plaque as Ss. One possible explanation is that Sg has an extensive battery of cell surface adhesins that recognize a wide range of substrates and enable Sg to adhere to different surfaces. For example, the Sg cell surface adhesin Hsa mediates strong binding to salivary pellicle, and enables Sg to outcompete Ss for adhesion to pellicle-coated surfaces in vitro 10.

This study aimed to identify and compare the core and pan genomes of Ss and Sg in order to enhance our understanding of the differences between these two closely-related species. Comparative genome analyses were performed in order to investigate potential differences in phylogeny, virulence, biology and genomics.

Results and Discussion

Genome Overview

Fourteen strains of Sg and 5 strains of Ss were successfully sequenced, assembled, annotated and identified. The assembled genomes have an average genomic size of 2,290,927 bp with an average G + C content of 41.2%. The genome completeness and identities of the 14 Sg strains ranged from 88–95% and 95–98%, respectively. The five Ss strains achieved genome completeness between 84% to 97% and genome identities between 95 to 96%. The Rapid Annotation Subsystem Technology (RAST) annotation pipeline predicted approximately 2,117 to 2,429 protein-coding genes and 2–6 ribosomal RNA genes in both Streptococcus species. Sg genomes harbor between 38–47 transfer RNAs with an average GC content of 40.5%, whereas Ss genomes have 40–49 transfer RNAs with a relatively higher average GC content of 43.2% (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of the genome features of 19 newly sequenced Streptococcus strains.

Strain PV40 Blackburn Channon FSS2 FSS3
Status of genome Contigs Contigs Contigs Contigs Contigs
Genome Size (Mbp) 2.19 2.16 2.23 2.19 2.31
GC content (%) 40.5 40.5 40.6 40.5 40.2
Number of CDS 2170 2132 2236 2165 2212
Number of tRNAs 46 42 42 46 42
Number of rRNAs 3 3 3 3 5
Genome Identity (%) 98 96 96 98 96
Genome Mapped (%) 95 90 89 92 92
Number of final contigs 43 50 33 18 382
Strain FSS8 M5 M99 MB666 MW10
Status of genome Contigs Contigs Contigs Contigs Contigs
Genome Size (Mbp) 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.31 2.19
GC content (%) 40.6 40.6 40.5 40.3 40.5
Number of CDS 2132 2117 2128 2314 2158
Number of tRNAs 38 41 43 46 38
Number of rRNAs 2 3 3 3 3
Genome Identity (%) 95 95 95 96 98
Genome Mapped (%) 90 88 89 90 92
Number of final contigs 41 67 45 20 27
Strain NCTC 7863 FSS4 FSS9 MB451 PJM8
Status of genome Contigs Contigs Contigs Contigs Contigs
Genome Size (Mbp) 2.3 2.31 2.43 2.45 2.37
GC content (%) 43.3 43.2 43.1 42.9 43.2
Number of CDS 2284 2294 2418 2429 2326
Number of tRNAs 40 49 47 47 42
Number of rRNAs 6 3 3 3 5
Genome Identity (%) 95 95 95 96 95
Genome Mapped (%) 84 85 97 94 92
Number of final contigs 110 63 20 27 162
Strain PK488 SK12 SK120 SK184 *Sg Challis *Ss SK36
Status of genome Contigs Contigs Contigs Contigs Complete Complete
Genome Size (Mbp) 2.2 2.15 2.16 2.26 2.2 2.39
GC content (%) 40.4 40.6 40.4 40.5 40.5 43.4
Number of CDS 2176 2143 2119 2273 2173 2385
Number of tRNAs 37 47 47 42 59 61
Number of rRNAs 3 3 3 3 12 12
Genome Identity (%) 96 95 96 97 100 100
Genome Mapped (%) 91 89 90 92 100 100
Number of final contigs 46 27 28 53

The details include genome size, GC content (%), number of coding sequences (CDSs), tRNAs, rRNA, genome identity and the percentage of the genome mapped to the reference. There are a total of 14 Sg strains and 5 Ss strains (underlined). The reference genomes of Sg Challis and Ss SK36 are marked with asterisks.

Phylogenetic inference

To identify the taxonomic position of each sequenced isolate, we constructed phylogenetic trees using both single gene and whole-genome approaches. The single gene approach utilized the 16S rRNA housekeeping gene to construct a phylogenetic tree using Streptococcus parasanguinis as an outgroup species (Fig. 1a). 16S rRNA gene sequences have been widely used as gene markers to differentiate species of Streptococcus genus particularly for α-hemolytic streptococci including Ss and Sg11. Our 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree clearly classified the 19 Streptococcus strains into two clades: 14 strains of Sg (PV40, Blackburn, Channon, FSS2, FSS3, FSS8, M5, M99, MB666, MW10, PK488, SK12, SK120 and SK184) and 5 strains of Ss (NCTC 7863, FSS4, FSS9, MB451 and PJM8). Sg and Ss are closely related and are approximately 97% identical across the 16S rRNA gene.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The single gene marker 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree (a) and core genome-SNP phylogenetic tree (b) classified 14 strains of Sg and 5 strains of Ss into different species clades using Streptococcus parasanguinis as the outgroup.

To further support our classification results, we reconstructed a phylogenetic tree using core-genome Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) data, providing a more robust tree compared to the single gene approach. Encouragingly, our data showed that the classification results from the core-genome SNP-based tree (Fig. 1b) were consistent with the classification from the 16S rRNA-based tree with only a few slight differences. For example, our 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1a) classified Sg FSS8 and Sg MB666 in the same clade while Sg FSS3 and Sg M5 were in a separate clade. On the other hand, Sg M5 and Sg MB666 are grouped under the same clade whereas Sg FSS8 and Sg FSS3 are housed under their adjacent divided clade in the core-genome SNP-based tree (Fig. 1b). Interestingly, Sg FSS2, MW10 and PV40 are almost identical at the level of 16S rRNA gene sequence and whole genome SNP, even though these strains were isolated from different sources at different times. Sg FSS2 and PV40 were from Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, Sg MW10 was isolated in Sydney Australia; Sg PV40 and MW10 were from the oral cavity, whereas FSS2 originated from a case of bacterial infective endocarditis.

Sg and Ss have open pan-genomes

Gathering all the functional genes of 14 strains of Sg, we determined a total number of 4,401 pangenomic gene families of Sg. The accessory gene families contributed a larger part of the pan-genome composition (2,774 genes) than the core gene families (1,627 genes). The accessory gene families were further classified into 1,968 dispensable genes (shared by 2 to 13 strains) and 806 strain-specific genes (shared by only one strain). The core gene families of Sg accounted for approximately 37.0% of the total gene families. Due to the low number of Ss isolated strains (5 strains), we included 22 other Ss genomes from the public NCBI database in this analysis in order to have a better representation of this species as a whole. These were all the Ss genomes available at the time of conducting the analysis. Based on the 27 Ss strains, a total of 5,100 pangenomic gene families were identified. The core gene families comprise 1,739 genes (34.1%) and the remainders are accessory gene families. Of the 3,361 accessory gene families, 7% are strain-specific. The pan-genome and core-genome sizes of Ss and Sg were estimated by extrapolation of the above genome data. Briefly, we calculated the gene clusters and core gene families of Streptococcus genomes, represented by N (N = 1, 2, 3 ….. 25, 26, 27). All permutations of genome comparisons for every pan-genome size and core genome of N genomes were analyzed to avoid random bias. Simultaneously, their mean values were predicted and depicted along the core genome family curve and pan-genome family curve. The generated pan-genome curves of both Sg and Ss are well-represented by the Heaps law mathematical functions: Y = 573.705131118841 X0.603 + 1559.42450454357 and Y = 816.330402837524 X0.455 + 1410.909236541, respectively, where Y refers to the pan-genome size while X refers to the number of sequenced Streptococcus genomes. According to these equations, the pan-genome size (Y) of both Sg and Ss appeared to reach infinity when the number of genomes (X) increase to infinity (Fig. 2a and c). Therefore, our data suggest that both Sg and Ss have open pan-genomes, which indicates that both species have infinite genomes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pan-genome analyses. Curves for Sg (a) and Ss (c) pan-genomes and core genomes. The blue dots denote the Streptococcus pan-genome size for each genome comparison whereas the green dots indicate the Streptococcus core genome size for each genome comparison. The median values were connected to represent the relationship between number of genomes and gene families. Curves for Sg (b) and Ss (d) illustrate the number of expected new genes detected with every increase in the number of Streptococcus genomes.

For Sg, the rate of new discovery stabilizes at approximately 110 new genes per additional new genome (Fig. 2b). For example, 295 new genes were detected when a second genome was added to the first Sg genome. The mathematical equation predicted 119 new genes gained by the Sg species with every new Sg genome added. For Ss, we estimated about 61 new genes detected when each additional genome is added (Fig. 2d). Here, we inferred that Sg and Ss have approximately 34–37% of core genes of their total gene clusters, probably inclining to an open pan-genome. The infinite pan-genome of Ss and Sg suggests the bacteria will keep acquiring new genes as they evolve independently over evolutionary time. The intake of new genes may alter the bacterial genome structure and facilitate adaptation of Streptococcus species to a dynamic or changing niche12.

Orthologous gene family comparisons

To identify the overlap between the predicted gene functions within the Sg and Ss genomes, we clustered all predicted genes from both species that were generated during the pan-genome analysis. We compared the core genes of Sg and Ss and found they shared a large set of gene families (1,372), reflecting a high similarity between the two species. Notably, Ss has a relatively higher number of unique core gene families (367) compared to unique core genes of Sg (255) (Fig. 3a).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Venn diagram of comparative analysis of orthologous genes in Sg and Ss (a) and functional enrichment analysis of unique core genes (b). These species share a high number of core genes. Ss has relatively higher species-specific genes compared to Sg. The functional enrichment analysis indicates Ss unique core genes (orange bars) are statistically enriched in two conserved biological processes: cobalamin biosynthesis and biosynthesis of porphyrin-containing compounds. Ss SK36 genes were used as background dataset for comparison.

To examine the biological functions of unique core genes, we performed a functional enrichment analysis using Blast2GO software13. We found no statistically enriched functions of unique core genes of Sg. In contrast, we found the unique core genes of Ss are significantly over-represented in porphyrin-containing compound biosynthetic processes and the cobalamin biosynthetic process (Fig. 3b).

The porphyrin-containing compound biosynthetic pathway leads to biosynthesis of porphyrin-containing compounds such as heme or siroheme14. In Ss (NCTC 7863), the superpathway of heme biosynthesis includes a number of branch points that lead to biosynthesis of a variety of important compounds such as vitamin B12 (cobalamin), siroheme and heme D15. Eight genes involved in the porphyrin-containing compound biosynthetic pathway were identified in the unique core genome of S. sanguinis (Table S1). Four of these genes encode enzymes predicted to be involved in the biosynthesis of uroporphyrinogen III from glutamyl-tRNA: glutamyl-tRNA reductase (EC 1.2.1.70), glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase (EC 5.4.3.8), porphobilinogen deaminase (EC 2.5.1.61) and uroporphyrinogen III synthase (EC 4.2.1.75). Therefore, the ability to synthesise uroporphyrinogen III appears to be conserved among Ss strains.

Uroporphyrinogen III is the first macrocyclic intermediate in the biosynthesis of tetrapyrroles. In S. sanguinis it is likely that uroporphyrinogen III is particularly important for cobalamin biosynthesis since genes encoding all components of the cobalamin biosynthetic pathway were present in the unique core genes of Ss. Interestingly, two types of gene clusters, cobCMTU and cbiACDGHKMNP are primary cobalamin (vitamin B12) biosynthesis genes which have been well-characterized in Salmonella Typhimurium16. The cbi genes located at the 5′ end of the operon are devoted to synthesis of the corrin ring while the cob genes located at the 3′ end of the operon are required for the assembly of the nucleotide loop of cobalamin17. Cobalamin is required as a cofactor in the enzymatic pathways for degradation of ethanolamine into ammonia and acetaldehye and breakdown of propanediol. Previous studies have reported that cobalamin can enable different bacterial species to obtain carbon and nitrogen in anaerobic conditions within the host when ethanolamine and propanediol are abundant18.

Cobalamin is a cobalt-containing vitamin and genes associated with cobalt/nickel uptake cbi/nikMNQO were also present in the unique core genome of Ss. These were functionally annotated under the membrane transport group. This gene cluster was first identified in the genome sequence of Ss SK3619. These genes are encoded within the upstream region of the cobalamin biosynthesis genes in bacterial genomes including Ss20. Previous research reported that the periplasmic binding protein NikA and ATPase NikE transporters from the NikABCDE system of Escherichia coli belong to the nickel/peptide/opine ABC transporter family21. The cbiMNQO operon encodes an Energy Coupling Factor (ECF) transporter. These systems are a subgroup of ABC transporters and CbiMNQO is essential for cobalt and nickel uptake in bacteria22. Moreover, the transport of nickel and cobalt along with cobalamin synthesis is particularly important in bacteria to support survival in host environments23. Hence, cobalamin synthesis and high-affinity cobalt/nickel uptake might contribute to the survival and growth of S. sanguinis in dental plaque and/or to its ability to cause infective endocarditis19.

Comparative prophage analysis

Prophages may carry new genes that play important roles in the acquisition of new traits and the generation of genetic diversity24. Prophages in the genomes of Sg and Ss were predicted using the Phage Search Tool (PHAST) software25. In total, twelve putative prophages were identified: eight in Sg and four in Ss. These included five intact prophages, four of which were Sg strain-specific and one was Ss strain-specific (Fig. 4). Only two prophages (FSS4_1 and MB451_1) are conserved across all Ss strains. In addition to phage protein orthologs, two attachment sites: attL and attR and ancillary enzymes such as integrase were detected in most of these prophages, providing further evidence that they were acquired by horizontal gene transfer (Table S2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Intact prophages in Sg and Ss. 5 intact prophages were detected, of which four were present in Sg (FSS8_1, SK12_1, SK184_1 and SK184_3) and only one was found in Ss (7863_1).

Interestingly, an operon composed of the efeUOB system along with genes of the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway, tatA (Sec-independent protein secretion pathway component) and tatC (Sec-independent protein translocase) was found within the conserved prophage FSS4_1 in all 6 Ss genomes including the reference genome of Ss SK36. The EfeUOB system can import ferrous iron under acid conditions whereas the Tat system exports folded proteins across bacterial cytoplasmic membranes26, 27. Streptococcus thermophilus was the first Streptococcus species reported to possess genes of the Tat system. Subsequently, tatA and tatC genes were detected in Ss SK36, encoded by SSA_1133 and SSA_1132, respectively19, 26. Therefore, we suggest that the acquisition of the FSS4_1 prophage containing the efeUOB-tat operon by Ss occurred early after the separation of Ss from Sg.

Another conserved prophage MB451_1 found in Ss contains a gene encoding N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase, a streptococcal phage lysin found in Streptococcal C1 bacteriophage28. This enzyme hydrolyzes the N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amide bond between the glycan strand and the cross-linking peptide of peptidoglycan29. We then utilized the Phage Classification Tool Set (PHACTS), which is an online computational tool, to classify the lifestyle of the MB451_1 prophage30. PHACTS predicted the prophage MB451_1 to have a temperate lifestyle (including both lytic and lysogenic phases) with an averaged probability of 0.55 and standard deviation of 0.045. Hence, we deduced that the lysogenic phase enables prophage MB451_1 which carries N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase to survive without killing the host.

Comparative Pathogenomics Analysis

The genetic basis that underlies the transition of oral streptococci from commensals in the mouth to pathogens in infective endocarditis is currently unclear. To identify potential virulence factors of Sg and Ss, we performed a comparative virulence gene profiling analysis using 27 genomes of Ss and 15 genomes of Sg.

We screened for putative virulence genes in all genomes by BLAST searching all protein-coding genes against the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) with stringent criteria (see Methods). In total, 150 non-redundant virulence genes were identified across all 42 Streptococcus genomes. Of the 150 genes, Sg strains possessed 97 to 126 of the virulence genes, whereas Ss strains had 101–139 of the virulence genes (Figure S1). In total, 79 of these genes were shared between Sg and Ss. The common virulence genes include a variety of loci involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis, including homologues of cps, rml and rgp gene clusters. Interestingly, the core loci for polysaccharide production appear to fall into two distinct groups that are fairly evenly distributed across Sg and Ss. This provides further evidence that these species are continually evolving and exchanging genetic material in order to adapt and thrive within the host.

In Streptococcus pneumoniae, synthesis of capsular polysaccharides is dependent upon a large gene cluster that consists of four regulatory genes followed by serotype-specific cps genes31. This locus encodes the machinery required to synthesize and export capsular polysaccharides from the cell. Oral streptococci generally do not produce clear capsules in vitro, but most strains examined to date include homologous loci with four regulatory genes upstream of genes for polysaccharide biosynthesis and export. In many oral streptococci, including strains of Sg and Ss, these genetic loci mediate production of receptor polysaccharides (RPSs) that participate in cell-cell adhesion (coaggregation) with other oral bacteria32. The structure and function of these RPSs are determined by the precise combinations of transferases and polymerases present in a particular strain. For example, Sg 38 and Ss SK45 contain similar rps gene clusters located downstream of the nrdG gene but produce antigenically distinct RPSs, probably due to the presence of glycosyl transferases encoded by wefB and wefC in Sg38, compared with wefH in Ss SK4532, 33. Polysaccharides produced by some strains of Sg and Ss, including Sg Challis and Ss SK36, are not involved in coaggregation. Disruption of the polysaccharide gene locus in Sg Challis abrogated adhesion to collagen type I or II, indicating that the Sg Challis polysaccharide may be more important for the recognition of host tissue rather than other bacteria34.

Closer examination of genome sequences in the strains presented here identified rps gene clusters similar to those of Sg 38 and Ss SK45 in several Sg strains but not in Ss (Fig. 5). Only Sg MB666 contained wefB, whereas Sg M99, SK12 and SK120 contained similar gene clusters without wefB. All other streptococci sequenced here contained the first four genes downstream of nrdG (wzg, wzh, wzd and wze) but lacked clear homologues of the Sg 38 genes wchA, wchF, wefA, wefB, wefC, wefD, wzy, wzx, glf and wefE. Homologues of wchF were identified, but these were always at a separate locus from nrdG-wze. Analysis of the Sg Challis genome region downstream of wze identified a number of other putative glycosyltransferases and polysaccharide production enzymes that have not yet been well characterized (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Illustration of rps/polysaccharide gene clusters of Sg 38 and Sg Challis in Streptococcus genomes. Color coding is as follows: nrdG gene upstream of the polysaccharide gene cluster (purple), regulatory genes (red), transferases (yellow), putative phosphorylcholine transferase licD3 (orange), polysaccharide polymerases (green), flippases (blue), nucleotide-linked sugar synthesis (magenta).

The Mauve genome analysis tool separated the Sg Challis polysaccharide biosynthesis locus into 9 locally contiguous blocks (LCB’s) (Figure S2). All of these were present in the same order in Sg strains PV40, FSS3, Blackburn, MW10, SK184, PK488 and FSS2. Sg FSS8 lacked a large central region containing 5 LCB’s. Sg Channon displayed an absence of a smaller region of 2 LCB’s and Sg M5 was missing a region of 2 LCB’s at the 3′ end of the locus. All Ss strains shared the core polysaccharide locus structure with Sg Challis, with the exception that they lacked the 3′ LCB. Moreover, the Sg 38-type rps loci in Sg MB666, SK12, SK120 and M99 were clearly distinguishable from Sg Challis in the Mauve analysis (Figure S2).

Since the Sg Challis-type polysaccharide gene cluster structure is so widely conserved, we propose that this is the ancestral gene cluster in Sg and Ss strains. Presumably, the Sg 38-type gene cluster arrangement has arisen at least twice by horizontal gene transfer since it is present in at least one strain of both Sg and Ss, although it was not observed in any Ss strains analyzed here. It is notable that the strains harboring Sg 38-type rps gene loci did not cluster together by either 16S rRNA or whole genome SNP analysis (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, this does not exclude the possibility that these strains have diverged from a common ancestor after acquiring the Sg 38-type rps locus.

Genes encoding enzymes involved in the production of key substrates for polysaccharide biosynthesis are located at a number of loci that are distinct from the polysaccharide biosynthesis/export operons. For example, dTDP-L-rhamnose, is synthesized by the products of the rml genes. Of these, rmlACB are located downstream of gufA whilst rmlD is on a separate operon downstream of orf15 32. These rml genes appear to be conserved in Sg and Ss strains, indicating that they play key functions in the metabolism of these species. The rml genes, together with rgp genes, may also be involved in the synthesis of other rhamnose glucose polymers (RGPs) that have been identified in a range of streptococci35. In Streptococcus suis, RGPs have been linked to several pathology-induced functions such as triggering sepsis, stimulating release of inflammatory cytokines and provoking nitric oxide production36. RGPs of oral streptococci have been shown to stimulate platelet aggregation, a process that is thought to be important in the pathogenesis of streptococcal infective endocarditis37. The RGPs also play significant roles in assisting bacteria to escape killing by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes38. Overall, the synthesis of RGPs by Ss and Sg may contribute to their pathogenesis in infective endocarditis, as well as modulating initial adhesion during the colonization of tooth surfaces and the formation of dental plaque.

The ability of Sg to adhere to host surfaces and tissues is thought to be important for colonization of the oral cavity, as well as attachment to endothelial tissue and platelet binding in infective endocarditis. A family of serine-rich repeat glycoproteins plays a key role in adhesion to glycosylated host substrates including platelets39. These polypeptides have an N-terminal binding region (BR), a long highly repetitive serine-rich domain and a C-terminal LPxTG cell wall anchor. Variants of BRs have been described that have distinct specificities for host substrates. The SrpA-type is found in Ss strains, whereas Hsa and GspB variants are each present in different subsets of Sg strains. Several of the Sg strains employed in the current study have been assessed for their ability to induce platelet adhesion40. In general, the level of Hsa expressed on the cell surface correlated with platelet binding levels, whereas the association was not so clear for strains that produce the GspB variant. Using PCR primers specific for the hsa or gspB BR-encoding sequence we identified one strain, Sg PK488, which did not appear to have either variant (data not shown). Nevertheless, Sg PK488 was shown to bind the model sialoglycoprotein fetuin in a sialic acid-dependent manner (Figure S3). Therefore, to gain a better understanding of the distribution of serine-rich repeat proteins in Sg and Ss, we drew a phylogenetic tree based on the BRs of serine-rich repeat proteins predicted from the whole genome sequences (Figure S3). All but one of the Ss strains had an SrpA-type BR, whereas the majority of Sg strains clustered with the Hsa variant or the GspB type. However, the BRs of Sg PK488 and Ss FSS4 did not fall within any of these clusters. They appeared to be more closely related to GspB than to Hsa or SrpA. It is not clear whether the unusual BRs of Sg PK488 and Ss FSS4 have arisen through horizontal gene transfer. We noted that the region upstream of the genes encoding serine-rich repeat proteins was different in Sg compared with Ss. In all Sg strains, this region contains genes involved in pyridoxine metabolism, including a predicted regulator, pdxK encoding pyridoxal kinase and pdxU encoding a pyridoxine transporter. By contrast, in all Ss strains including FSS4, there is a serine tRNA immediately upstream of the gene encoding the serine-rich repeat protein. Therefore, it appears that a genome rearrangement event likely occurred around the time of the speciation event that separated Sg from Ss. It will be interesting to determine whether they confer a different binding specificity from other BRs that may influence their ability to colonize host tissues or adhere to platelets.

Figure 6 shows the main differences in putative virulence genes between Sg and Ss. Virulence-associated genes present uniquely in Ss include SSA1511, SSA1512, SSA1515 and SSA1516, which encode hypothetical membrane proteins and glycosyltransferases. Additionally, mf2 and mf3 (mitogenic factor 2 and 3), which were only detected in Ss, encode DNases which have been reported in other streptococci to reduce the viscosity of pus via their enzymatic activity, facilitating the colonization of bacteria across tissue surfaces during invasive streptococcal infections41. The virulence gene analysis also identified the iga gene among the unique genes of Ss. The iga gene encodes IgA protease, and previous studies have shown IgA protease activity in Ss but not in Sg5. The IgA protease has been shown to enhance adhesion of oral bacteria to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite42. The proteolytic activity of IgA proteases decreases the efficiency of secretory antibodies43. However, Fab alpha fragments are generated to sustain the antigen-binding function on the bacterial cell surface, promoting Ss adherence to tissues in the oral cavity43. The IgA proteases have exquisite specificity for human IgA, and therefore the presence of IgA proteases in Ss suggests an independent evolution of the enzymes in proteolysis during colonization or infection of humans44.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The screenshot of heatmap shows the main differences of virulence genes harbored by Ss and Sg. The blue box (a) shows the unique virulence genes of Ss while the orange box (b) depicts the unique virulence genes of Sg.

Strikingly, the Sg-specific cyl gene cluster appears to be unique to Sg and the β-haemolytic Group B streptococci45. Together, cylA and cylB encode an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter46 that plays important roles in antibiotic resistance as multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters in addition to its core function as an exporter of the Cyl cytolysin47. We investigated the homologs of cylA and cylB genes and found three homologs for each gene in Streptococcus agalactiae, which currently annotated as hypothetical proteins, cylA/cylB proteins and cylA/cylB permeases separately. We assessed the completeness of the S. agalactiae cyl genes against the Sg cyl genes. There was remarkably high sequence coverage and sequence identity for cylA and cylB genes which were (100/78.64)% and (100/80.82)%, respectively. To further verify this finding, we also tested the sequence coverage of cyl genes in the complete whole-genome of Ss SK36 and the results showed that cyl genes are likely to be absent in Ss genomes. Given the presence of these genes in all Sg strains, this may provide the first evidence of CylA and CylB production by the α-haemolytic Sg. The role of CylA/B in multidrug resistance in Sg remains to be determined.

Comparative Genomic Island (GI) analysis

Oral streptococci encounter significant fluctuations in environmental conditions such as surrounding pH, oxygen tension or osmolarity when growing in dental plaque. The transition to the bloodstream environment involves an even greater shift in the conditions of the external environment. We postulated that the adaptation and evolution of streptococci to cope with different environments within the human body may have been mediated through the acquisition of gene clusters or GIs by horizontal gene transfer. Typically, GIs in bacteria harbor genes encoding important traits such as antibiotic resistance, symbiosis and fitness48. Therefore, horizontally transferred GIs in the genomes of Sg and Ss were predicted using the IslandViewer software tool49.

In total, 13 putative GIs were identified: two conserved GIs shared by all Sg and Ss strains, 6 Sg-specific GIs and five Ss-specific GIs (Table 2 and Table S3). For example, GI_55 was found to be conserved in Sg and Ss and is composed of a series of putative V-type ATP synthase subunits (C, E, F, G, I and K) and a GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) family acetyltransferase. V-type ATP synthases are exclusively found in low GC, gram-positive bacteria and utilize the free energy released from phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP) or ATP hydrolysis to pump solutes across the membrane against concentration gradients50. A recent report has suggested V-type ATPases in Streptococcus pyogenes are regulated by a group of small RNAs. Most V-type ATPases pump hydrogen ions from the cytosol, ensuring the survival of Streptococcus species by overcoming acid stress during growth or infection51. It is possible that these systems help Ss and Sg to survive cycles of acidification within dental plaque. Alternatively, these systems may pump Na+ ions rather than H+ since it has been shown that the Enterococcus hirae V-type ATPase pumps Na+ ions, and promotes survival in high pH52. However, the actual function of this system is still unclear and further work is required to determine the substrate specificity and physiological roles of streptococcal V type ATPases. Overall, it is likely that the acquisition of the 5,516 bp GI_55 by Sg and Ss through lateral gene transfer may have enhanced their ability to survive in low-pH environments such as cariogenic dental plaque.

Table 2.

Summary of predicted GIs in the genomes of Sg and Ss.

Genomic Island Size (bp) Sg Ss
PV40 Blackburn Channon FSS2 FSS3 FSS8 M5 M99 MB666 MW10 PK488 SK12 SK120 SK184 NCTC 7863 MB451 PJM8 FSS4 FSS9
GI_5 5253 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
GI_14 10312 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
GI_16 5085 # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
GI_31 5557 * * * * *
GI_43 7035 * * * * *
GI_45 5556 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
GI_47 7627 * * * * *
GI_51 7355 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
GI_53 4194 * * * * *
GI_55 5516 # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
GI_58 7364 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
GI_67 4094 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
GI_75 4183 * * * * *

Two conserved GIs were shared by Ss and Sg (marked with hashtag), six Sg-specific GIs (marked with backslash) and five Ss-specific GIs (marked with asterisks).

Another conserved GI, GI_16, consists of: iojap (Iowa-japonica) protein, a methyltransferase, a hydrolase from the Haloacid Dehalogenase (HAD) superfamily, yqeK gene and nicotinate-nucleotide adenylyltransferase. In bacteria, the ybeB gene is the ortholog of iojap protein which usually forms a conserved operon with the ybeA gene encoding a predicted methyltransferase. This ybe operon gene is often found adjacent to the nadD gene encoding nicotinate-nucleotide adenylyltransferase in nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide (NAD) biosynthesis53. Additionally, this ybe operon has been reported to have an overlapping coding region with the yqeK gene, encoding a metal-dependent phosphatase54. Together, nadD and ybeB appear to form a two-domain fusion protein53. Hence, we deduced the methyltransferase found in GI_16 is a likely a homologue of the ybeA gene which shares an operon with ybeB gene. However, the significance of the association between yqeK and nadD as well as the structural terminology of nadD-YbeB complex remains unknown.

Out of the six Sg-specific GIs detected, GI_67 is comprised of genes camG, encoding a putative lipoprotein, and parE, encoding topoisomerase IV subunit B. The camG gene encodes a lipoprotein, with a leader sequence that includes a 7-amino acid peptide pheromone known as gordonii-cAM373 heptapeptide SVFILAA55. This pheromone is required for transfer of plasmid DNA from Enterococcus faecalis into Sg and has been associated with multiple antibiotic resistance55. We hypothesize that genes on GI_67 may facilitate the exchange of antibiotic resistance genes between oral bacteria within dental plaque.

Interestingly, the putative Sg-specific GI_45, GI_51 and GI_58 which vary in size from 5,556 to 7,364 bp share a large group of paralogous genes. The com gene cluster, comCDE, is located in all three putative GIs. These genes encode a peptide pheromone (comC) and a sensing system (comDE) that are involved in quorum sensing, transformation and biofilm formation56, 57. Inactivation of comD and comE leads to abnormal biofilm formation which eventually decreased plaque biomass57, 58. Hence, the competence regulation operon found in GI_45, GI_51 and GI_58 of Sg activates streptococcal cell-cell peptide signaling systems of Sg via exogenous DNA incorporation, enabling acid tolerance of Sg in oral biofilm formation59. Apart from its role in oral biofilm formation, comCDE has also been implicated in increasing genome plasticity via uptake of new genes60, DNA repair61, as well as providing nutrition of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and energy source for Sg62. It is likely that the presence of multiple comCDE systems may enhance the capacity of Sg to uptake genetic material, and increase its rate of evolution. Within GI_45, GI_51 and GI_58 we identified another streptococcal plasmid acquired gene, parB, which is associated with important biological processes of DNA replication, cell division and cell growth63. In other bacteria such as Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli, parB is part of an operon along with the parA gene that together have been implicated in drug resistance, stress response, and pathogenesis64. It is unclear whether parB is important in Sg since parA is absent.

Another important gene, present within GI_45, GI_51 and GI_58, is the degP/htrA gene, which encodes a protein responsible for folding, maturation and degradation of secreted proteins65. Recently, the htrA gene has been shown to play a key role in the repair of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-damaged DNA and protein66. The accumulation of misfolded proteins causes the susceptibility of bacteria towards high temperatures and reactive oxygen intermediates stresses. In S. pyogenes, degP gene knockout is impaired in virulence in a mouse model of streptococcal infection67. Therefore, the presence of degP/htrA may enable Sg to overcome thermal, oxidative and osmotic stresses, thus indirectly enhancing its virulence in infections.

We identified five putative Ss-specific GIs known as GI_31, GI_43, GI_47, GI_53, and GI_75. Of these, GI_31 is a particular concern since it carries a permease of the drug/metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily and a TetR/AcrR family transcriptional regulator (TFR), and thus is potentially an antibiotic resistance island. The DMT Superfamily which consists of 35 distinctive subfamilies is associated with multi-drug and various antibiotic resistances68. In addition, the TFRs have been reported to be overarching regulators involved in numerous processes including biosynthesis or degradation of fatty acids69, antibiotic biosynthesis or activation70, biofilm formation71, toxin production72, and cell-cell signaling73.

We also found an intrinsic putative GI_47, which houses different functional gene components, within six genomes of Ss. This GI includes a GNAT acetyltransferase that may convey aminoglycoside resistance. A ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase E (rsmE) is also found in GI_47. This gene encodes an enzyme that methylates DNA, RNA, proteins or small molecules such as catechol and is also associated with antibiotic resistance74, 75. In addition, GI_47 includes the “housecleaning” gene mutt encoding a nudix family protein that catalyzes pyrophosphohydrolase activity directed at the removal of mutagens arising from inappropriate methylation by rsmE as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by endogenous metabolites76. Two mobile elements and an integrase found within this putative GI_47 provide evidence that this region has been horizontally transferred to Ss.

Two putative Ss-specific GIs, GI_53 and GI_75, were found to include genes encoding CAAX amino protease family members and TetR family transcriptional regulators (TFR). Two genes, bfrH1 and bfrH2 encode CAAX family proteins. In Ss, these two genes are regulated by the BfrABss two-component system which controls the expression of two bfrCD-homologous operons (bfrCDss and bfrXYss), a bfrH-homologous gene (bfrH1ss) and another CAAX amino-terminal protease family protein gene (bfrH2ss). Homologues of this BfrABss system are required for biofilm formation by oral streptococci77. According to a recent report from Jimin and colleagues78, Ss has the highest known level of CAAX amino protease compared to other species. It is likely that these CAAX effector proteases are important for the biological function of Ss, perhaps by contributing to establishment and survival within dental plaque.

Antibiotic Resistance analysis

Based on the genomic island (GI) analysis, we found that many of the genes on the GIs have been associated with antimicrobial resistance, including GNAT acetyltransferases, parE, and TetR family regulators. For example, GNAT acetyltransferases have been associated with reistance to aminoglycosides such as gentamicin79. Variants of parE, along with gyrA, gyrB and parC, are associated with elevated resistance to fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin80. TetR-family regulators are often responsible for up-regulation of multi-drug effleux pumps, leading to resistance to many different antibiotics81. Therefore, we tested the resistance of all the newly sequenced Sg and Ss strains to nine different types of antibiotic: erythromycin, trimepthoprim, sulphamethoxazole, tetracycline, penicillin G, clindamycin, gentamicin, fusidic acid and ciprofloxacin. All Sg and Ss strains were sensitive to erythromycin, penicillin G, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin, moderately sensitive to gentamicin and fusidic acid and resistant to trimethoprim and sulphamethaxazole. Interestingly, five strains (Ss MB451 and Sg strains PV40, FSS2, MB666 and MW10) were found to be resistant to tetracycline, whereas all other strains were sensitive. Genome analysis identified the tetM gene in all the tetracycline-resistant streptococcal strains and not in any of the other strains, indicating the acquisition of the tetM resistance determinant likely has conferred tetracycline resistance in S. sanguinis and S. gordonii strains. Nevertheless, there was no evidence that genes present on genomic islands in Sg or Ss were responsible for harboring antibiotic resistance determinants.

In conclusion, our comparative genome analyses provide insights into the differing ecological strategies of Sg and Ss. Both species are common within dental plaque and both have the potential to cause infective endocarditis. However, Ss is usually present in higher numbers than Sg, and differing associations between these species and oral disease have been shown. Functions such as cobalamin biosynthesis, IgA protease activity and CAAX proteases may contribute to the expansion of Ss within dental plaque. On the other hand, the presence of cylA and cylB within the core genome of Sg is interesting and warrants further study. There are no genes that are clearly enriched in endocarditis isolates, and this is in keeping with the observation that oral and endocarditis isolates of Ss do not form distinct subclones82. It is clear that both Sg and Ss have open pan genomes and these species continue to evolve and acquire new genes. Potentially, the exchange of genetic information between bacteria in biofilms may accelerate the spread of antibiotic resistance between bacteria in the oral cavity. Overall, our comparative analyses of Sg and Ss will provide a basis for understanding how these species establish within dental plaque and how they transition from commensal species within the mouth to important pathogens in infective endocarditis.

Methods

Bacterial isolation and DNA extraction

The 19 strains of Ss and Sg included in this study (PV40, NCTC7863, Blackburn, Channon, FSS2, FSS3, FSS4, FSS8, FSS9, M5, M99, MB451, MB666, MW10, PJM8, PK488, SK12, SK120 and SK184) were originally isolated from four different geographical regions. Of these, thirteen were originally isolated from the United Kingdom, four from the United States and one each from Denmark and Australia. Six strains originated from oral cavity samples; ten strains were from subacute bacterial endocarditis and the origin of the other three is not known. All Streptococcus strains were cultured in THYE medium (30 g/L Todd Hewitt broth, 5 g/L yeast extract) for 16 hours at 37 °C prior to DNA extraction.

Library preparation and next-generation sequencing

Chromosomal DNA was extracted as previously described83. Libraries were prepared by fragmentation of DNA samples using a Covaris S2 ultrasonicator for 120 sec at 5.5–6.0 °C. The quantity and quality of the fragmented DNA were evaluated using an Agilent BioAnalyzer 2100. The sample was size selected using Invitrogen 2% agarose E-gels. For DNA library construction, only the fragments tagged with adapter molecules at both ends underwent 10 cycles of PCR. The constructed genomic library was validated using an Agilent BioAnalyzer 2100. The 19 Streptococcus genomes were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq 2000 sequencing platform. The paired-end sequencing of Streptococcus genomes uses a standard read length of 100 base pairs. The Streptococcus genomes were run on a single lane, employing the TruSeq LT assay. The paired-end sequencing generates two FASTQ output data files: one containing the forward primer (“AGATCGGAAGAGCACACGTCTGAACTCCAGTCA”) derived reads “_R1” and one containing the reverse primer (“AGATCGGAAGAGCGTCGTGTAGGGAAAGAGTGT”) derived reads “_R2”. The detailed sequencing results are shown in Tables S4 and S5.

Raw read quality checking and preprocessing

The raw read quality was verified through FastQC software84. The overall genome showed satisfactory results of per base N content and optimal per base sequence quality with no overrepresented sequences. The quality score is directly proportional to the level of base call. Data pre-processing was completed by a trimming approach using CLC Genomic Workbench V6.5 (CLC BIO Inc., Aarhus, Denmark). A series of trimming operations offered by CLC Genomic Workbench V6.5 were employed: quality trimming based on quality scores, ambiguity trimming of gaps in scaffold genomes, adapter trimming, base trimming by removing a specified number of bases at either 3′ or 5′ end of the reads and length trimming within a specified threshold. We selected the quality trimming which applies the modified-Mott trimming algorithm. All genome sequences were trimmed based on Phred quality score Q20 (1/100 bases). The default parameter for quality trimming was applied, allowing a maximum of 2 ambiguities. The trimming approach is crucial in order to ensure adequate stringency of the Streptococcus genomic sequences.

Genome assembly and annotation

The de novo assembly was performed using CLC Workbench 6.5 with Phred quality score Q20 (1/100 bases). In general, genome assembly involved the generation of simple contig sequences using the information within the read sequences. The N50 contig was estimated by summarizing the lengths of the largest contigs until half of the total contig length. High N50 values of the genomes and the low contig numbers of genomes are indicative of good genome assemblies. After assembly, the assembled genome sequences were searched against common contaminant databases for contamination screening and any contaminated sequences were removed. To gain better insights into the assembled genomes and to evaluate the completeness of these Streptococcus genomes, we mapped all assemblies onto the complete reference genomes of Ss SK36 and Sg Challis using the NUCmer program85. Genome annotation of these 19 Streptococcus genome sequences was then performed via the fully automated Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) pipeline86. Genes and functional proteins were assigned based on their phylogeny relationship relatedness in FIGfams database subsystem and metabolic pathways.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) and phylogenetic inference

For single gene marker 16S rRNA phylogeny tree, we extracted the predicted 16S rRNA sequences from each Streptococcus genome using RNAmmer 1.2 Server87. Next, we conducted multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of single gene 16S rRNA sequences using MAFFT web-based program88. Core-genome SNP sequences of each Streptococcus genome were determined via the Panseq online web-tool89. Panseq aligned all genome sequences and identified core/conserved genome regions. SNPs were called within the core genome sequences. Alignments of these core genome SNPs were performed using ClustalW from European Bioinformatics Institute. Ultimately, the generated MSA results from both MAFFT and Panseq servers were then run on MEGA6 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis 6) software90 in order to build the phylogenetic tree. The phylogeny trees of both 16S rRNA and core-genome SNPs were constructed using 1,000 bootstrapping replications via the Neighbour-Joining (NJ) algorithm method.

Orthologous gene family comparisons and pan-genome analysis

The pan-genome analysis describes a complete gene set of all strains of a species including the core genome (genes present in all strains), and the accessory genome which comprises the dispensable genome (genes present in two or more strains) and the unique genome (genes specific to single strains). The pan-genome study of the Streptococcus isolates was performed using the Pan-Genomes Analysis Pipeline (PGAP) which implements functional ortholog clustering using the amino acid sequences of Ss and Sg based on Gene Family (GF) method91. Each amino acid sequence was labelled with specific strain identifiers which are later concatenated into a single input sequence file. Using the BLASTALL algorithm, the minimum score value was set to 50 and E-value to 10−892. Based on the Markov Cluster Algorithm (MCL), the amino acid sequence cutoff was adjusted to 50% identity and 50% coverage in order to group two genes into the same cluster93. Finally, in-house Perl scripts were used to retrieve amino acid sequences of accessory genes and searched against oral Streptococcus genomes using TBLASTN. This method was used to identify gene content which could be overlooked by the RAST pipeline.

Functional enrichment analysis

In order to associate putative biological functions with the unique core genes of Ss and Sg, and to discover unexpected shared functions between these unique core genes, we performed functional enrichment analysis using Blast2GO software94. The Blast2GO functional annotation involves three steps: BLAST to find homologous sequences, MAPPING to retrieve Gene Ontology (GO) terms and ANNOTATION to select reliable functions. BLAST was implemented using the amino acid sequences of reference strains Ss SK36 and Sg Challis. After MAPPING and ANNOTATION, we then ran InterPro Scan prior to functional enrichment process. Target lists of Ss and Sg unique core genes were selected respectively for specialized functional enrichment analysis, generating GO graphs from tables of under- and over-enriched Streptococcus unique core genes.

Virulence gene prediction

Virulence genes of Ss and Sg were identified by BLAST searching 42 amino acid sequences of the Streptococcus genomes against the virulence factor database (VFDB)95. In-house Perl scripts were then used to process BLAST outputs (generated by searching these query sequences against VFDB) for each RAST-predicted protein (query sequence) in the oral Streptococcus genomes. The filtered BLAST results were consolidated and virulence genes with minimum mapped sequence identity and sequence coverage of 50% in both query and subject were organised in a matrix table. Lastly, in-house R scripts were used for hierarchical clustering and a heat map was generated for visualization. Predicted virulence genes are highlighted in red in heat map (Figure S1), indicating the presence of virulence genes in Streptococcus species.

The rps locus genes prediction on 19 strains of Sg and Ss was performed manually using our in-house scripts. The protein sequences of the first four regulatory genes: wzg (gi|157075510|gb|ABV10193.1|:1–486), wzh (gi|157075683|gb|ABV10366.1|:1–243), wzd (gi|157076133|gb|ABV10816.1|:1–231) and wze (gi|157076456|gb|ABV11139.1|:1–231) were extracted from the Sg Challis genome stored in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) resource, while the amino acid sequences of the 10 genes: wchA (Q83YQ3), wchF (Q83YS0), wefA (Q83YR9), wefB (Q83YQ5), wefC (Q83YR8), wefD (Q83YR4), wzy (Q83YR3), wzx (Q83YR2), glf (A0A0F2CL65) and wefE (Q83YR0) were retrieved from the same species genome available on UniProt resource. Next, we performed protein BLAST using these rps locus gene sequences against Streptococcus protein sequences. The protein BLAST results were then filtered based on the threshold of 50% sequence identity and 50% sequence coverage. To determine whether similar genome arrangements were present in other Sg and Ss strains, genomes were analyzed for the presence of ‘locally collinear blocks’ (LCBs) via the Mauve genome analysis tool96.

Comparative prophage analysis

The 12 different putative prophages of Sg and Ss were identified using PHAST (Phage Search Tool) web server25. The assembled contig sequences of the Streptococcus species were concatenated to serve as input files for the prophage prediction by the PHAST. The identification and completeness of these putative prophages were evaluated through a series of operations including genome-scale ORF prediction and translation via GLIMMER, protein, phage sequence and tRNA identification, attachment site recognition and gene clustering density measurements as well as sequence annotation text mining. The predicted putative prophages were eliminated if the prophages were located within two different contigs. All putative prophages were then BLAST searched across strains of Ss and Sg for genome completeness checking to verify their presence in oral streptococcal genomes with nucleotide sequence identity cutoff values of 70% identity and 70% coverage. An intact prophage was defined by achieving scores ≥90 by PHAST. To predict the lifestyle of the prophage, we utilized the Phage Classification Tool Set (PHACTS)30 which involved a novel similarity algorithm and Random Forest Classifier. The file which contains the protein sequences of the predicted genes in the phage as uploaded for phage lifestyle annotation using a similarity algorithm. Datasets consisting of various sizes of partial proteomes were created. Each proteome was created by randomly selecting a replacement phage with a known lifestyle followed by randomly choosing a set of contiguous proteins in that phage. Lastly, classification of the lifestyle of a phage (‘virulent’ or ‘temperate’) is performed by Random Forest classifier.

Comparative Genomic Island (GI) analysis

The putative GIs in Ss and Sg were predicted by the IslandViewer software tool49 which involved three different GI identification approaches: sequence composition-based approaches using SIGI-HMM and IslandPath-DIMOB, and the comparative genomics approach using IslandPick. The predicted GIs were then further filtered by removing GIs with genomic length less than 10 kbp. Likewise, the predicted putative GIs from IslandViewer were further inspected by omitting GIs that mapped across two different contigs. We utilized BLASTClust to cluster similar GI sequences, with parameters set so that any two GIs with at least 50% sequence identity and 50% sequence coverage would be clustered together.

Antibiotic resistance testing

Resistance to penicillin G, clindamycin, gentamicin, fusidic acid, erythromycin, trimethoprim, sulphamethoxazole and tetracycline was tested using an M43 Mastring (Mast Group Ltd, Bootle, UK) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, bacteria were cultured for 16 h in THYE broth, and suspensions of cells (100 µl) were spread over the surface of solidified THYE medium. A Mastring was placed on the plate, and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The zone of diffusion was measured. Strains were considered resistant if zones of clearance were <1 mm, intermediate where zones were 1–5 mm and sensitive if zones were >5 mm. A similar disk diffusion test was used to assess resistance to ciprofloxacin, using individual disks impregnated with 0.002 µg/ml ciprofloxacin (MA0104, Thermo Fisher).

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all members of Genome Informatics Research Group (GIRG) in contributing to this research. This project was supported by University of Malaya and Ministry of Education (MOHE), Malaysia under the High Impact Research (HIR) Grant [Account No. UM.C/HIR/MOHE/08]; and UM Research Grant (UMRG) [Account No. UMRG: RG541-13HTM].

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: S.W.C., N.S.J., I.C.P. Performed the experiments: W.Z., M.F.T., L.A.O. Analysed and interpreted the data: W.Z., N.S.J., S.W.C. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: S.W.C., N.S.J., W.Z., L.A.O. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: W.Z., S.W.C., I.C.P., N.S.J.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02399-4

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Nicholas S. Jakubovics, Email: nick.jakubovics@ncl.ac.uk

Siew Woh Choo, Email: lawrence.choo@xjtlu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Jakubovics NS, Yassin SA, Rickard AH. Community interactions of oral streptococci. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2014;87:43–110. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800261-2.00002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nobbs A, Jenkinson H, Jakubovics N. Stick to Your Gums Mechanisms of Oral Microbial Adherence. Journal of dental research. 2011;90:1271–1278. doi: 10.1177/0022034511399096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hall-Stoodley L, et al. Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. 2012;65:127–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Isaksson J, et al. Comparison of species identification of endocarditis associated viridans streptococci using rnpB genotyping and 2 MALDI-TOF systems. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2015;81:240–245. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kilian M, Mikkelsen L, Henrichsen J. Taxonomic study of viridans streptococci: description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906) International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1989;39:471–484. doi: 10.1099/00207713-39-4-471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Teng JL, et al. Phylogenomic and MALDI-TOF MS analysis of Streptococcus sinensis HKU4T reveals a distinct phylogenetic clade in the genus Streptococcus. Genome biology and evolution. 2014;6:2930–2943. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eren AM, Borisy GG, Huse SM, Welch JLM. Oligotyping analysis of the human oral microbiome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111:E2875–E2884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409644111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stingu C-S, Eschrich K, Rodloff AC, Schaumann R, Jentsch H. Periodontitis is associated with a loss of colonization by Streptococcus sanguinis. Journal of medical microbiology. 2008;57:495–499. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47649-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shchipkova A, Nagaraja H, Kumar P. Subgingival microbial profiles of smokers with periodontitis. Journal of dental research. 2010;89:1247–1253. doi: 10.1177/0022034510377203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nobbs AH, Zhang Y, Khammanivong A, Herzberg MC. Streptococcus gordonii Hsa environmentally constrains competitive binding by Streptococcus sanguinis to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Journal of bacteriology. 2007;189:3106–3114. doi: 10.1128/JB.01535-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thompson, C. C., Emmel, V. E., Fonseca, E. L., Marin, M. A. & Vicente, A. C. P. Streptococcal taxonomy based on genome sequence analyses. F1000Research2 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Kurland C, Canback B, Berg OG. Horizontal gene transfer: a critical view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100:9658–9662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1632870100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Conesa A, et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674–3676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ryter SW, Tyrrell RM. The heme synthesis and degradation pathways: role in oxidant sensitivity: heme oxygenase has both pro-and antioxidant properties. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2000;28:289–309. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00223-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caspi R, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic acids research. 2014;42:D459–D471. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Raux E, et al. Salmonella typhimurium cobalamin (vitamin B12) biosynthetic genes: functional studies in S. typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Journal of bacteriology. 1996;178:753–767. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.3.753-767.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Banerjee, R. Chemistry and Biochemistry of B12 (John Wiley & Sons, 1999).
  • 18.Khatri N, Khatri I, Subramanian S, Raychaudhuri S. Ethanolamine utilization in Vibrio alginolyticus. Biol Direct. 2012;7:45. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu P, et al. Genome of the opportunistic pathogen Streptococcus sanguinis. Journal of bacteriology. 2007;189:3166–3175. doi: 10.1128/JB.01808-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen Y-YM, Burne RA. Identification and characterization of the nickel uptake system for urease biogenesis in Streptococcus salivarius 57. I. Journal of bacteriology. 2003;185:6773–6779. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.23.6773-6779.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Navarro C, Wu LF, Mandrand-Berthelot MA. The nik operon of Escherichia coli encodes a periplasmic binding-protein-dependent transport system for nickel. Molecular microbiology. 1993;9:1181–1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rodionov DA, Hebbeln P, Gelfand MS, Eitinger T. Comparative and functional genomic analysis of prokaryotic nickel and cobalt uptake transporters: evidence for a novel group of ATP-binding cassette transporters. Journal of bacteriology. 2006;188:317–327. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.1.317-327.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang Y, Rodionov DA, Gelfand MS, Gladyshev VN. Comparative genomic analyses of nickel, cobalt and vitamin B12 utilization. BMC genomics. 2009;10:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pallen MJ, Wren BW. Bacterial pathogenomics. Nature. 2007;449:835–842. doi: 10.1038/nature06248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou, Y., Liang, Y., Lynch, K. H., Dennis, J. J. & Wishart, D. S. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic acids research, gkr485 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Lee PA, Tullman-Ercek D, Georgiou G. The bacterial twin-arginine translocation pathway. Annual review of microbiology. 2006;60:373. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cornelis, P. & Andrews, S. C. Iron uptake and homeostasis in microorganisms (Horizon Scientific Press, 2010).
  • 28.Oliveira H, et al. Molecular aspects and comparative genomics of bacteriophage endolysins. Journal of virology. 2013;87:4558–4570. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03277-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Llull D, López R, García E. Skl, a novel choline-binding N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase of Streptococcus mitis SK137 containing a CHAP domain. FEBS letters. 2006;580:1959–1964. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McNair K, Bailey BA, Edwards RA. PHACTS, a computational approach to classifying the lifestyle of phages. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:614–618. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mavroidi A, et al. Genetic relatedness of the Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular biosynthetic loci. Journal of bacteriology. 2007;189:7841–7855. doi: 10.1128/JB.00836-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang J, Yoshida Y, Cisar JO. Genetic basis of coaggregation receptor polysaccharide biosynthesis in Streptococcus sanguinis and related species. Molecular oral microbiology. 2014;29:24–31. doi: 10.1111/omi.12042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yoshida Y, Ganguly S, Bush CA, Cisar JO. Molecular basis of L-rhamnose branch formation in streptococcal coaggregation receptor polysaccharides. Journal of bacteriology. 2006;188:4125–4130. doi: 10.1128/JB.01843-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Giomarelli B, et al. Binding of Streptococcus gordonii to extracellular matrix proteins. FEMS microbiology letters. 2006;265:172–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00479.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yamashita Y, Tsukioka Y, Tomihisa K, Nakano Y, Koga T. Genes Involved in Cell Wall Localization and Side Chain Formation of Rhamnose-Glucose Polysaccharide inStreptococcus mutans. Journal of bacteriology. 1998;180:5803–5807. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.21.5803-5807.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Holden M, et al. Rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kerrigan, S. W. & Cox, D. Platelet-Bacterial Interactions as Therapeutic Targets in Infective Endocarditis (2012).
  • 38.Tsuda H, et al. Role of serotype-specific polysaccharide in the resistance of Streptococcus mutans to phagocytosis by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Infection and immunity. 2000;68:644–650. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.2.644-650.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Deng L, et al. Oral streptococci utilize a Siglec-like domain of serine-rich repeat adhesins to preferentially target platelet sialoglycans in human blood. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004540. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kerrigan SW, et al. Role of Streptococcus gordonii surface proteins SspA/SspB and Hsa in platelet function. Infection and immunity. 2007;75:5740–5747. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00909-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Relman DA, et al. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. Complement. 2000;77:22. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Reinholdt J, Tomana M, Mortensen S, Kilian M. Molecular aspects of immunoglobulin A1 degradation by oral streptococci. Infection and immunity. 1990;58:1186–1194. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.5.1186-1194.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reinholdt J, Kilian M. Interference of IgA protease with the effect of secretory IgA on adherence of oral streptococci to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Journal of dental research. 1987;66:492–497. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660021801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gilbert JV, Plaut AG, Wright A. Analysis of the immunoglobulin A protease gene of Streptococcus sanguis. Infection and immunity. 1991;59:7–17. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.1.7-17.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rosa-Fraile M, Dramsi S, Spellerberg B. Group B streptococcal haemolysin and pigment, a tale of twins. FEMS microbiology reviews. 2014;38:932–946. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Spellerberg B, et al. Identification of genetic determinants for the hemolytic activity of Streptococcus agalactiae by ISS1Transposition. Journal of bacteriology. 1999;181:3212–3219. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.10.3212-3219.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gottschalk B, et al. Transport of multidrug resistance substrates by the Streptococcus agalactiae hemolysin transporter. Journal of bacteriology. 2006;188:5984–5992. doi: 10.1128/JB.00768-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dobrindt U, Hochhut B, Hentschel U, Hacker J. Genomic islands in pathogenic and environmental microorganisms. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2004;2:414–424. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Langille MG, Brinkman FS. IslandViewer: an integrated interface for computational identification and visualization of genomic islands. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:664–665. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Samuels, D. S. Borrelia: molecular biology, host interaction and pathogenesis (Horizon Scientific Press 2010).
  • 51.Tesorero, R. A. et al. Novel regulatory small RNAs in Streptococcus pyogenes (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 52.Soontharapirakkul K, Incharoensakdi A. Na+ -stimulated ATPase of alkaliphilic halotolerant cyanobacterium Aphanothece halophytica translocates Na+ into proteoliposomes via Na+ uniport mechanism. BMC biochemistry. 2010;11:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-11-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bernhardt TG, De Boer PA. Screening for synthetic lethal mutants in Escherichia coli and identification of EnvC (YibP) as a periplasmic septal ring factor with murein hydrolase activity. Molecular microbiology. 2004;52:1255–1269. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04063.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Branda SS, et al. Genes involved in formation of structured multicellular communities by Bacillus subtilis. Journal of bacteriology. 2004;186:3970–3979. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3970-3979.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vickerman M, et al. A genetic determinant in Streptococcus gordonii Challis encodes a peptide with activity similar to that of enterococcal sex pheromone cAM373, which facilitates intergeneric DNA transfer. Journal of bacteriology. 2010;192:2535–2545. doi: 10.1128/JB.01689-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cheng Q, Campbell E, Naughton A, Johnson S, Masure H. The com locus controls genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Molecular microbiology. 1997;23:683–692. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2481617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jack AA, et al. Streptococcus gordonii comCDE (competence) operon modulates biofilm formation with Candida albicans. Microbiology. 2015;161:411–421. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li Y-H, et al. A quorum-sensing signaling system essential for genetic competence in Streptococcus mutans is involved in biofilm formation. Journal of bacteriology. 2002;184:2699–2708. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.10.2699-2708.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Matsui R, Cvitkovitch D. Acid tolerance mechanisms utilized by Streptococcus mutans. Future microbiology. 2010;5:403–417. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Claverys JP, Prudhomme M, Mortier-Barrière I, Martin B. Adaptation to the environment: Streptococcus pneumoniae, a paradigm for recombination-mediated genetic plasticity? Molecular microbiology. 2000;35:251–259. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Prudhomme M, Attaiech L, Sanchez G, Martin B, Claverys J-P. Antibiotic stress induces genetic transformability in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Science. 2006;313:89–92. doi: 10.1126/science.1127912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Finkel SE, Kolter R. DNA as a nutrient: novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs. Journal of Bacteriology. 2001;183:6288–6293. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6288-6293.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Varon E, Gutmann L. Mechanisms and spread of fluoroquinolone resistancein Streptococcus pneumoniae. Research in microbiology. 2000;151:471–473. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(00)00167-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Baek JH, Rajagopala SV, Chattoraj DK. Chromosome segregation proteins of Vibrio cholerae as transcription regulators. MBio. 2014;5:e01061–01014. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01061-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kim D-Y, Kim K-K. Structure and function of HtrA family proteins, the key players in protein quality control. BMB Reports. 2005;38:266–274. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2005.38.3.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Henningham, A., Döhrmann, S., Nizet, V. & Cole, J. N. Mechanisms of group A Streptococcus resistance to reactive oxygen species. FEMS microbiology reviews, fuu009 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Jones CH, Tove’C B, Jones KF, Zeller GO, Hruby DE. Conserved DegP Protease in Gram-Positive Bacteria Is Essential for Thermal and Oxidative Tolerance and Full Virulence inStreptococcus pyogenes. Infection and immunity. 2001;69:5538–5545. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5538-5545.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Västermark Å, Almén MS, Simmen MW, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB. Functional specialization in nucleotide sugar transporters occurred through differentiation of the gene cluster EamA (DUF6) before the radiation of Viridiplantae. BMC evolutionary biology. 2011;11:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Feng Y, Cronan JE. Complex binding of the FabR repressor of bacterial unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis to its cognate promoters. Molecular microbiology. 2011;80:195–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07564.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Uguru GC, et al. Transcriptional activation of the pathway-specific regulator of the actinorhodin biosynthetic genes in Streptomyces coelicolor. Molecular microbiology. 2005;58:131–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Croxatto A, et al. VanT, a homologue of Vibrio harveyi LuxR, regulates serine, metalloprotease, pigment, and biofilm production in Vibrio anguillarum. Journal of Bacteriology. 2002;184:1617–1629. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.6.1617-1629.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.MacEachran DP, Stanton BA, O’Toole GA. Cif is negatively regulated by the TetR family repressor CifR. Infection and immunity. 2008;76:3197–3206. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00305-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pompeani AJ, et al. The Vibrio harveyi master quorum-sensing regulator, LuxR, a TetR-type protein is both an activator and a repressor: DNA recognition and binding specificity at target promoters. Molecular microbiology. 2008;70:76–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06389.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Morić I, et al. rRNA Methyltransferases and their role in resistance to antibiotics. Journal of Medical Biochemistry. 2010;29:165–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Vester, B. & Long, K. S. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria caused by modified nucleosides in 23S ribosomal RNA (2000).
  • 76.Bessman MJ, Frick DN, O’Handley SF. The MutT proteins or “Nudix” hydrolases, a family of versatile, widely distributed,“housecleaning” enzymes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996;271:25059–25062. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.41.25059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhang Y, et al. The two-component system BfrAB regulates expression of ABC transporters in Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus sanguinis. Microbiology. 2009;155:165–173. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.023168-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pei J, Mitchell DA, Dixon JE, Grishin NV. Expansion of type II CAAX proteases reveals evolutionary origin of γ-secretase subunit APH-1. Journal of molecular biology. 2011;410:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Burk DL, Ghuman N, Wybenga-Groot LE, Berghuis AM. X-ray structure of the AAC (6′)-Ii antibiotic resistance enzyme at 1.8 Å resolution; examination of oligomeric arrangements in GNAT superfamily members. Protein science. 2003;12:426–437. doi: 10.1110/ps.0233503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Maeda, Y. et al. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of gyrA, gyrB, parC and parE gene loci in viridans group streptococci isolated from adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, dkq485 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 81.Ramos JL, et al. The TetR family of transcriptional repressors. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2005;69:326–356. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.69.2.326-356.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Do T, et al. Clonal structure of Streptococcus sanguinis strains isolated from endocarditis cases and the oral cavity. Molecular oral microbiology. 2011;26:291–302. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2011.00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Old L, Lowes S, Russell R. Genomic variation in Streptococcus mutans: deletions affecting the multiple pathways of β-glucoside metabolism. Oral microbiology and immunology. 2006;21:21–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2005.00246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Andrews, S. (2011).
  • 85.Delcher AL, Phillippy A, Carlton J, Salzberg SL. Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic acids research. 2002;30:2478–2483. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.11.2478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Aziz RK, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lagesen K, et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic acids research. 2007;35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Katoh K, Kuma K-i, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic acids research. 2005;33:511–518. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Laing C, et al. Pan-genome sequence analysis using Panseq: an online tool for the rapid analysis of core and accessory genomic regions. BMC bioinformatics. 2010;11:461. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular biology and evolution. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhao Y, et al. PGAP: pan-genomes analysis pipeline. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:416–418. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of molecular biology. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic acids research. 2002;30:1575–1584. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.7.1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Conesa, A. & Götz, S. Blast2GO: A comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. International journal of plant genomics2008 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 95.Chen, L., Xiong, Z., Sun, L., Yang, J. & Jin, Q. VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic acids research, gkr989 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 96.Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome research. 2004;14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES