Table 5.
Perceived importance of the usefulness of collecting sustainability indicators.a
| During funding |
After funding ends |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | CO | NY | OR | Mean | CO | NY | OR | |
| # of organizations that have implemented new policies to sustain program delivery | 8.00 | 10b | 5 | 9 | 3.00 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| # of policies deployed at local level | 7.33 | 10b | 5 | 7 | 3.00 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| # of policies deployed at regional level | 4.33 | 7b | 5 | 1 | 3.00 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| # of policies deployed at state level | 5.33 | 10b | 5 | 1b | 4.67 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
| # of healthcare systems actively implementing fall prevention programs | 9.00 | 10b | 8 | 9b | 3.67 | 7 | 3 | 1 |
| # of healthcare systems implementing significant systems change to include clinical integration (systems that have integrated into EHR) | 6.33 | 10b | 8 | 1b | 2.00 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| # of healthcare systems implementing significant systems change to include centralized referral systems | 7.67 | 8b | 8 | 7b | 2.00 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| # of systems in place to efficiently connect older adults to classes | 8.67 | 10b | 8 | 8 | 2.67 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
aMeasured on a scale of 1 (not important) to 10 (extremely important).
bIndicates that State DOH is currently collecting information about this sustainability indicator.