Table 1.

Comparison of the mapped of sequences^a of different treatments using two transcriptomes of Persea americana: avocado drymifolia (TAD) and avocado Hass (TFH).

Condition	Time (h)	Total Reads	bACE=1		cACE>1		% Overall alignment
		Paired-end	TAD	TFH	TAD	TFH	TAD	TFH
	0	20,631,843	21.9	60.9	67.1	21.5	92.9	89.7
Control fruits	1	15,265,622	19.5	60.7	66.8	21.3	93.4	91
	6/9	16,360,548	18.3	60.4	67.1	19.4	92.4	88.8
	24	21,012,239	17	64.6	71.1	17.5	94.1	90.4
Inoculated (P)	0	26,558,994	18.6	62.4	71	19.5	94	89.1
	1	40,574,501	16.9	61.2	68	17.4	92.9	88.9
	6/9	18,767,327	17.9	61.7	70	19.7	94.4	90
	24	21,095,442	17.6	63.2	71.8	19.6	94.6	90.4
Chitosan treatment (Q)	0	16,596,262	17.2	70.7	69.9	10.3	94.5	90.9
	1	17,946,164	18.2	58.5	64.6	17.4	91.2	86.9
	6/9	15,299,619	20.8	60.8	68	21.3	93.2	89.2
	24	13,715,619	19.7	60.4	67.7	19.4	92.7	87.8
Chitosan treatment and inoculated (QP)	0	15,457,171	17.3	61.3	68.4	17.7	92.9	88.4
	1	16,702,260	19	61.4	67.4	18.8	92.7	88.6
	6/9	18,244,858	19.6	61.6	70.3	21.1	93.8	89
	24	18,901,106	14.1	63.7	72.8	13.5	90.4	84.4

^aValues of ACE = 1, ACE > 1 and overall alignment represent the percentage of alignment using Bowtie2 program, P < 0.05.

^bAligned concordantly exactly 1 time.

^cAligned concordantly >1 times.