Table 2.
Differential expression profilea of different treatments using two reference transcriptomes of Persea americana: var drymifolia (TAD) and avocado Hass (TFH).
| Comparison matrix | Condition_time | bDown-Regulated | Up- regulated | cTDE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAD | TFH | TAD | TFH | TAD | TFH | ||
| Inoculated (P) vs. control fruit | P_0 | 27 | 15 | 240 | 154 | 1,888 | 1,422 |
| P_1 | 296 | 258 | 1,139 | 912 | |||
| P_6/9 | 20 | 9 | 21 | 19 | |||
| P_24 | 233 | 141 | 295 | 179 | |||
| Inoculated (P) and chitosan treatment (Q) vs. control fruit | QP_0 | 172 | 178 | 901 | 755 | 3,031 | 3,112 |
| QP_1 | 63 | 70 | 314 | 267 | |||
| QP_6/9 | 16 | 17 | 70 | 53 | |||
| QP_24 | 187 | 187 | 2,130 | 2,302 | |||
| Chitosan treatment (Q) vs. control fruit | Q_0 | 129 | 143 | 1,372 | 1,126 | 2,880 | 2,587 |
| Q_1 | 359 | 355 | 1,838 | 1,689 | |||
| Q_6/9 | 5 | 8 | 52 | 53 | |||
| Q_24 | 86 | 66 | 56 | 67 | |||
a
Values represent log2(Fold Change), p_value < 0.05.
b
Log2(FC) < −2 are Down-Regulated unigenes and Log2(FC) > +2 are Up-Regulated unigenes.
c
TDE: Total differential expression for each comparison. Up and Down regulated unigenes.