Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;2(6):e267–e276. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30078-6

Table 4.

Difference in area-based deprivation quintile between baseline and follow-up (from first admission, prescription, or death), by drinking status at baseline

Never or ex-drinker (n=3629) Light or moderate drinker (n=18439) Heavy or excessive drinker (n=5351)
Negative difference 175 (5%) 1249 (7%) 400 (7%)
–4 (biggest downward difference) 9 (<1%) 46 (<1%) 16 (<1%)
–3 14 (<1%) 144 (1%) 45 (1%)
–2 41 (1%) 326 (2%) 125 (2%)
–1 111 (3%) 733 (4%) 214 (4%)
No difference (0) 3270 (90%) 15 915 (86%) 4492 (84%)
Positive difference 184 (5%) 1275 (7%) 459 (9%)
1 118 (3%) 692 (4%) 251 (5%)
2 41 (1%) 352 (2%) 123 (2%)
3 16 (<1%) 193 (1%) 65 (1%)
4 (biggest upward difference) 9 (<1%) 38 (<1%) 20 (<1%)
Mean difference relative to non-drinkers (95% CI)
Adjusted for baseline deprivation quintile 0·00 0·05 (0·02–0·07) 0·07 (0·04–0·10)
Adjusted for baseline deprivation quintile, age, and sex 0·00 0·04 (0·02–0·07) 0·06 (0·03–0·09)
Adjusted for baseline deprivation quintile, age, sex, and time from interview to prescription 0·00 0·04 (0·02–0·07) 0·06 (0·03–0·09)
Adjusted for baseline deprivation quintile, age, sex, time from interview to prescription, and wave 0·00 0·04 (0·02–0·07) 0·06 (0·03–0·09)

Data are number of participants (%), unless otherwise indicated.