Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;6(6):1201–1219. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1071

Table 3.

Resection rate and R0 resection after neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

Group Resection rate R0 resected
Total [95% CI] 57.7% [49.5,65.5]
I 2  = 45.8%
(= 39)
84.2% [80.1,87.5]
I 2  = 27.8%
(= 36)
Resectable [95% CI] 73.0% [64.8,79.9]
I 2  = 40.7%
(= 14)
88.2% [82.1,92.5]
I 2  = 34.2%
(= 12)
Borderline resectable [95% CI] 40.2% [28.3,53.4]
I 2  = 45.8%
(= 19)
79.4% [72.2,85.0]
I 2  = 16.9%
(= 18)
Gemcitabine monotherapy [95% CI] 67.2% [43.3,84.6]
I 2  = 46.7%
(= 6)
91.7% [80.2,96.8]
I 2  = 39.8%
(= 6)
Non‐gemcitabine monotherapy [95% CI] 48.5% [26.3,71.3]
I 2  = 45.4%
(= 4)
86.4% [74.5,93.2]
I 2  = 0.0%
(= 3)
Combination therapy [95% CI] 55.6% [44.9,65.8]
I 2  = 46.0%
(= 26)
80.5%
[75.5,84.7]
I 2  = 17.8%
(= 24)
Gemcitabine‐based [95% CI] 61.1% [51.1,70.2]
I 2  = 45.9%
(= 28)
84.0% [78.7,88.1]
I 2  = 33.5%
(= 26)
Non‐gemcitabine‐based [95% CI] 42.0% [23.2,63.4]
I 2  = 46.2%
(= 8)
84.7%
[76.0,90.7]
I 2  = 0.0%
(= 7)
Chemotherapy [95% CI] 62.9% [45.6,77.4]
I 2  = 45.8%
(= 9)
75.3% [68.6,80.9]
I 2  = 7.3%
(= 9)
Chemo + radiotherapy [95% CI] 55.1% [45.4,64.4]
I 2  = 45.9%
(= 29)
86.5% [82.2,90.0]
I 2  = 23.8%
(= 26)