Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 7;37(3):BSR20170247. doi: 10.1042/BSR20170247

Table 4. Overall statistics to test publication bias and heterogeneity of this meta-analysis.

Comparisons Egger’s regression analysis Heterogeneity analysis Model used for this meta-analysis
Intercept 95% CI P-value Q-value Pheterogeneity I2 (%)
b compared with B –1.97 –4.57 to 0.62 0.12 73.158 0.000 75.396 Random
bb compared with BB –0.640 –2.63 to 1.35 0.50 52.043 0.000 65.413 Random
Bb compared with BB 0.818 –1.08 to 2.72 0.37 52.945 0.000 66.002 Random
bb + Bb compared with BB 0.277 –1.77 to 2.33 0.77 57.857 0.000 68.880 Random
bb compared with BB + Bb –1.87 –4.00 to 0.26 0.081 63.511 0.000 71.658 Random