Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;37(2):132–141. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1603

Table I.

Results in the literature after minimally invasive, sialographic-controlled treatment of salivary duct stenoses.

Author (year) Glands
total
(n)
SMG
(n)
PG
(n)
Partial
success of
procedure
(% glands)
Complete
success of
procedures
(% glands)
Improve of
symptoms
(% patients)
Recurrent or
persistent
complaints
(% patients)
Preservation of
gland
(%)
Buckenham et al. (1992)
(1993)
1
3
n.n. 1
3
-----
-----
100
100
n.n.
n.n.
n.n.
n.n.
n.n.
n.n.
Roberts et al. (1995) 3 ----- 3 ----- 100 100 33.3 n.n.
Brown et al. (1997) 30 6 24 ----- Total 86.7
SMG 50
PG 96
Total 77
SMG 33.3
PG 57
Total 30
SMG 66.7
PG 21.7
Total 93.3
SMG 33.3
PG 100
Waldmann et al. (1998) 1 ----- 1 ----- 100 100 100 100
Drage et al. (2002) 36 14 82 96 52 n.n.
Brown et al. (2006) 125 9.6 71.5 n.n. n.n. n.n.
Salerno et al. (2007) 9 2 7 Total 55.5
SMG 50
PG 57.2
Total 33.3
SMG 50
PG 28.6
Total 77.8
SMG 50
GP 85.7
Total 22.2
SMG 50
GP 14.3
n.n.

Legend: SMG: submandibular gland, PG: parotid gland