Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2015 Jul;19(3):207–211. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000080

TABLE 2.

Clinical Performance of p16INK4a Immunochemistry as Evaluated by Nonpathologist Readers and a Pathologist to Identify Women With Histologic Diagnosis of CIN2 or More Severe Diagnoses (CIN2+)

Reader result
Pathologist result
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) YI PLR Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) YI PLR
Reader 1 96 96 92 24 96 96 92 24
Reader 2 96 80 76 4.8 96 88 84 8.0
Reader 3 88 88 76 7.3 96 88 84 8.0
Reader 4 72 96 68 18 96 96 92 24
Reader 5 92 76 68 3.8 96 88 84 8.0
Reader 6 96 84 80 6.0 96 96 92 24
Reader 7 96 84 80 6.0 96 88 84 8.0
Reader 8 96 84 80 6.0 96 88 84 8.0
Reader 9 76 88 64 6.3 96 96 92 24
Reader 10 92 88 80 7.7 96 88 84 8.0
Reader 11 76 92 68 9.5 96 96 92 24
Reader 12 84 88 72 7.0 96 96 92 24
Mean/Overalla 88 87 75 6.8 96 92 88 12

YI, Youden Index (= sensitivity + specificity − 1); PLR, positive likelihood ratio.

a

The average performance of all reads for all tissues was calculated. The pathologist read all slides only once and the overall performance is presented.