Table 9.

Trends in the comprehensiveness of services for HIV care and treatment sites participating in the 2009 and 2014 survey, IeDEA global consortium (N = 55)

	2009 mean (SD)	2014 mean (SD)	Difference mean (SD)	p-Value
All regions	5.7 (1.1)	6.5 (0.7)	0.9 (1.2)	<0.001
Region				0.35
Central Africa	5.8 (1.0)	5.8 (1.0)	0.0 (1.4)
East Africa	6.0 (0.9)	6.9 (0.3)	0.9 (1.0)
West Africa	5.8 (1.3)	6.2 (1.0)	0.5 (1.5)
CCASAnet	4.8 (1.7)	6.0 (0.8)	1.2 (1.0)
Asia-Pacific	5.2 (1.1)	6.4 (0.8)	1.2 (1.1)
North America	5.0 (N/A)	7.0 (N/A)	2.0 (N/A)
Site location				0.92
Mostly rural	6.0 (0.0)	7.0 (0.0)	1.0 (0.0)
Mostly urban	5.8 (0.9)	6.8 (0.5)	1.0 (1.2)
Rural	6.4 (0.5)	7.0 (0.0)	0.6 (0.5)
Urban	5.4 (1.2)	6.4 (0.8)	0.9 (1.3)
Type of facility				0.39
Private	5.8 (1.2)	6.3 (0.8)	0.5 (1.0)
Public	5.6 (1.1)	6.6 (0.7)	0.9 (1.2)
Level facility				0.63
Primary	5.7 (1.2)	6.8 (0.6)	1.1 (1.2)
Secondary	5.9 (0.9)	6.9 (0.3)	1.0 (0.8)
Tertiary	5.5 (1.2)	6.2 (0.9)	0.7 (1.4)
Academic affiliation				0.36
No	5.8 (0.9)	6.5 (0.8)	0.7 (1.1)
Yes	5.5 (1.2)	6.5 (0.7)	1.0 (1.2)
Type of patients				0.14
Adults only	4.8 (1.1)	6.1 (0.8)	1.3 (1.4)
Adults and children	6.0 (0.9)	6.7 (0.6)	0.8 (1.0)
PEPFAR country (2014)				0.086
No PEPFAR	4.9 (1.1)	6.2 (0.9)	1.3 (1.4)
PEPFAR	6.0 (1.0)	6.7 (0.6)	0.7 (1.1)
UN Health Development Index				0.036
UN HDI low rank	6.0 (1.0)	6.6 (0.7)	0.7 (1.2)
UN HDI middle rank	5.5 (1.3)	6.0 (0.8)	0.5 (0.6)
UN HDI high rank	4.9 (1.0)	6.4 (0.8)	1.6 (1.0)

The first p-value is a paired Wilcoxon test, and the remaining p-values are the result from a one-way ANOVA F-test of site-level difference in comprehensiveness from site assessment 1.0 to 2.0.

All summaries are mean (standard deviation [SD]). If SD is N/A then there was only one observation in this category.