Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2017 Mar 20;38(14):1057–1070. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24782

Table 3.

Mean absolute deviations of atomic dielectric boundary forces (kcal/mol-e-Å) between different methods for the tested realistic molecular systems.

AT 1-d 2-s 2-o 2-s 1-o 1-s 2-o 1-s 1-o
1-d 0.0006166 0.001122 0.0003974 0.001800
2-s 2-o 0.001075 0.0002253 0.001622
2-s 1-o 0.001019 0.001738
1-s 2-o 0.001590

GC 1-d 2-s 2-o 2-s 1-o 1-s 2-o 1-s 1-o

1-d 0.0004025 0.0005604 0.0001765 0.001928
2-s 2-o 0.0004064 0.0002899 0.001883
2-s 1-o 0.0004922 0.001868
1-s 2-o 0.001933

RD 1-d 2-s 2-o 2-s 1-o 1-s 2-o 1-s 1-o

1-d 0.001035 0.001708 0.0006102 0.003224
2-s 2-o 0.001517 0.0004692 0.004186
2-s 1-o 0.001384 0.002837
1-s 2-o 0.003740

KD 1-d 2-s 2-o 2-s 1-o 1-s 2-o 1-s 1-o

1-d 0.001254 0.0006086 0.0009511 0.002305
2-s 2-o 0.0008443 0.0003400 0.001496
2-s 1-o 0.0006884 0.002228
1-s 2-o 0.001583

All forces values were extrapolated to h=0 Å before comparison.