Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 29;19(3):394–404. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now189

Table 4.

Prestratified by MGMT methylation and hTERT mutation log-rank test, Cox pairwise comparison and bootstrap validation while controlling for other clinical factors (age, gender, KPS, EOR, and bevacizumab treatment) in UCLA/Kaiser cohort

hTERT - MGMT Status Overall Survival Progression-free Survival
Median Survival
Log-rank P value
HR (95% CI)
P value
Bootstrap
HR (95% CI)
Median Survival
Log-rank P value
HR (95% CI) P value Bootstrap
HR (95% CI)
MUT-M vs MUT-U 28.3 mo vs 15.9 mo
P < .0001
0.32 (0.23, 0.43) P < .0001 0.31 (0.21, 0.42) 15.4 mo vs 7.86 mo
P < .0001
0.36 (0.27, 0.49) P < .0001 0.36 (0.24, 0.49)
WT-M vs WT-U 19.1 mo vs 17.8 mo
P = .4290
0.85 (0.48, 1.52) P = .5855 0.90 (0.44, 1.65) 10.8 mo vs 6.94 mo
P = .6875
0.88 (0.47, 1.65) P = .6931 0.96 (0.41, 2.06)
MUT-U vs WT-U 15.9 mo vs 17.8 mo
P = .0973
1.68 (1.13, 2.50) P = .0098 1.73 (1.13, 2.53) 7.86 mo vs 6.94 mo
P = .1395
1.57 (1.05, 2.36) P = .0287 1.59 (0.99, 2.37)
MUT-M vs WT-M 28.3 mo vs 19.1 mo
P = .0231
0.63 (0.37, 1.06) P = .0810 0.64 (0.32, 1.14) 15.4 mo vs 10.8 mo
P = .0318
0.65 (0.37, 1.14) P = .1324 0.65 (0.29, 1.17)

MUT: hTERT mutant; WT: hTERT wildtype; M: MGMT methylated; U: MGMT unmethylated.