Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 27;5(3):e00311. doi: 10.1002/prp2.311

Figure A1.

Figure A1

Illustration of full, partial, and competitive partial agonism with the often used example of histamine and impromidine, H2‐receptor agonist acting on isolated ventricular strips from human myocardium; data after (English et al. 1986). Concentration–responses shown are for histamine alone (blue symbols), impromidine alone (red symbols), and impromidine in the presence of a constant concentration (100 μmol/L) of histamine (purple symbols). As a partial agonist, impromidine alone can only produce a maximal response that is far less (~30%) than that obtainable with histamine, and when used in combination, it can displace the full agonist and actually produce a reduction in the overall response. Data were fitted with three individual curves separately using GraphPad Prism (A) and with a single set of parameters using the operational model (eq. 19 and 41) and the present model (eq. 31 and A12, assuming γ = 1 to avoid overparametrization and have the same number of parameters as the operational model) and (B). While the quality of fit in B is essentially identical with both models (overlapping light and dark lines; SSE values of 306.8 versus 311.7 as shown in the graphs), the parameter set of the operational model is quite meaningless especially for histamine (e.g., K d = 0.43 mol/L due to the large value of τ obtained by fitting). In the meantime, fit of all three curves with the present model using a single set of parameters results in values (B) consistent with those from the individual fit (A).