Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0178289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178289

Table 3. Diagnostic accuracy of immunoassays according to PAT result.

Immunoassay TP FN FP TN Sensitivity Specificity Difference in specificity Likelihood ratio
Percent
(95%CI)
p<0.05
compared to
Positive
(95%CI)
Negative
(95%CI)
PaGIA
Low threshold
(Positive/ negative)
12 0 27 132 100.0
(73.5, 100.0)
83.0
(76.3, 88.5))
AcuStar HIT-IgG 5.9
(4.2, 8.3)
0.0
Intermediate threshold
(Titre of 4)
12 0 7 152 100.0
(73.5, 100.0)
95.6
(91.1, 98.2)
22.7
(11.0, 46.9)
0.0
High threshold
(Titre of 32)
12 5 0 159 58.3
(27.7, 84.8)
100.0#
(97.7, 100.0)
>1000 0.29
Polyspecific ELISA (GTI)
Low threshold
(OD 0.4)
12 0 24 108 100.0
(73.5, 100.0)
81.8
(74.2, 88.0)
AcuStar HIT-IgG 5.5
(3.8, 7.9)
0.0
Intermediate threshold
(OD 1.3)
12 0 4 128 100.0
(73.5, 100.0)
96.8
(92.4, 99.2)
33.0
(12.6, 86.6)
0.0
High threshold
(OD 2.0)
12 0 3 132 100.0
(73.5, 100.0)
97.7
(93.5, 99.5)
44.0
(14.4, 130.0)
0.0
AcuStar HIT-IgG
Low threshold
(1.0 U/ml)
13 0 12 154 100.0
(75.3, 100.0)
92.8
(87.7, 96.2)
PaGIA, ELISA 13.8
(8.0, 23.9)
0.0
Intermediate threshold
(2.8 U/ml)
13 0 4 162 100.0
(75.3, 100.0)
97.6
(94.0, 99.3)
41.5
(15.8, 110.0)
0.0
High threshold
(9.4 U/ml)
11 2 1 165 84.6
(54.6, 98.1)
99.4
(96.7, 100.0)
140.5
(19.6, 1000.0)
0.15
(0.04, 0.55)

TP, true positives; FN, false negatives; FP, false positives; TN, true negatives

¶ p<0.05 for difference in specificity compared to low threshold

# p<0.05 for difference in specificity compared to intermediate threshold