Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0179163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179163

Table 4. Multivariate analyses by logistic regression for determination of risk factors (odds ratio) associated to four serologic profiles of domestic dogs tested by immunofluorescence assay (IFA).

Independent variables Dependent variable: seroreactivity to Rickettsia spp. (titer ≥64)
Cases Exposure P value Odds Ratio CI (95%) r2
Rural area 137 823 0.000 1.843 [1.314–2.586]
Hunting activity 54 213 0.000 2.132 [1.465–3.104] 0.066
Ticks* 23 196 0.001 2.492 [1.433–4.334]
Dependent variable: seroreactivity to R. amblyommatis (titer ≥64)
Cases Exposure P value Odds Ratio CI (95%) r2
Rural area 115 823 0.001 1.952 [1.338–2.848]
Hunting activity 47 213 0.000 2.203 [1.476–3.290] 0.075
Ticks* 22 160 0.000 2.941 [1.670–5.180]
Dependent variable: seroreactivity to R. amblyommatis (titer ≥512)
Cases Exposure P value Odds Ratio CI (95%) r2
Rural area 76 823 0.000 2.453 [1.492–4.034]
Hunting activity 32 213 0.001 2.311 [1.437–3.717] 0.077
Ticks* 12 99 0.009 2.433 [1.246–4.751]
Dependent variable: seroreactivity to R. amblyommatis with titers 4-fold higher than the titers for other Rickettsia species
Cases Exposure P value Odds Ratio CI (95%) r2
Rural area 53 823 0.020 1.946 [1.111–3.409]
Hunting activity 25 213 0.000 2.606 [1.522–4.460] 0.068
Ticks* 11 73 0.010 2.576 [1.259–5.270]

CI–Confidence interval

*Infestation by ticks different from R. sanguineus s.l.