Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 1;37(6):2196–2207. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16662044

Table 2.

Magnetic resonance imaging parameter values in each region of interest.

Regions of interest (mean ± SEM)
MRI parameters Contra LesionD0 Mismatch Hypoxia
ADC (µm2/s) 763 ± 15.6 576.7 ± 16.3 742 ± 7.5 563 ± 16.1#
CBF (ml/100 g/min) 153 ± 4.6 46 ± 5.1 61 ± 5.2 31 ± 2.0 #
BVf (%) 4 ± .1 2 ± .1 3 ± .1 2 ± .1 #
VSI (µm) 7 ± .6 10±.9 8 ± .7 9 ± .8
VD (mm−2) 289 ± 39.9 147 ± 40.8 230 ± 41.4 139 ± 51.1#
StO2 (%) 70 ± 1.5 47 ± 1.4 60 ± 2.2 22 ± .6 #

ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; BVf: blood volume fraction; CBF: cerebral blood flow; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; StO2: brain tissue oxygen saturation; VD: vessel density; VSI: vessel size index.

Significant differences detected by paired Student's t-test comparison (for ADC, CBF, BVf, VSI and StO2 maps) or by Wilcoxon Signed-rank (for VD map). In bold, ROIs different from LesionD0; #from ROI Mismatch. For all MRI parameters evaluated, the ROIs Mismatch, LesionD0 and Hypoxia were different from ROI Contra, except for the ROI Mismatch in ADC. Data are expressed as mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) p < 0.05.