Table 2.
Comparison of visit-level performance: our image-based classifiers vs. Pap tests and HPV tests.
Method | accu(%) | sensi(%) | speci(%) |
---|---|---|---|
Alfaro ThinPrep | 51.26±10.02 | 20.69±19 | 81.82±5.07 |
Cytyc ThinPrep | 69.01±4.77 | 49.55±8.14 | 88.46±3.33 |
Costa Rica Pap | 63.77±4.18 | 39.42±7.65 | 88.12±3.18 |
Hopkins Pap | 66.56±9.54 | 36.00±20.67 | 97.11±2.51 |
HPV16 | 64.01±4.66 | 33.82±7.41 | 94.19±3.69 |
HPV18 | 53.07±1.95 | 08.16±3.98 | 97.97±0.91 |
| |||
our RF.PLBP-PLAB-PHOG | 70.50±6.02 | 51.00±6.07 | 90.00±0 |
our ft-CNN | 65.00±5.11 | 40.00±7.34 | 90.00±0 |