Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2004 Sep;3216:151–159. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30135-6_19

Table 1.

Summary over 32 cases of the Dice comparison between the results of EM implementations and expert segmentations. The minimum and maximum list the worst and best Dice measure over all cases. As clearly by the numbers the new approach of this paper, EM-Shape, outperformed the other two methods

DICE Measure over 32 cases
Method Mean Variance Minimum Maximum
EM-Rigid 0.755 0.0221 0.449 0.883
EM-NonRigid 0.715 0.0149 0.34 0.883
EM-Shape 0.82 0.0117 0.625 0.909