Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Apr 15;40(5):1111–1121. doi: 10.1111/acer.13047

Table 10.

Robustness checks: Alternative DDD estimates for total crime incidents occurring in the low-SES neighborhoods

Total Crime For the entire stores in the low-SES neighborhoods (65 stores, N=213,363) For the reduced stores in the low-SES neighborhoods (19 stores, N=97,147)
Within a 1/8-mile radius Between 1/8- and 1/4-mile radii Between 1/4- and 1/2-mile radii Within a 1/8-mile radius Between 1/8- and 1/4-mile radii Between 1/4- and 1/2-mile radii
(1) Original model : Estimate by Poisson regressions (from Table 4 and 5) 0.045*
(0.018)
0.043*
(0.033)
0.041
(0.031)
0.061**
(0.021)
0.035*
(0.015)
−0.013
(0.026)
(2) “Tuesday” as the false affected day (falsification test) −0.003
(0.012)
−0.024
(0.013)
−0.028
(0.033)
−0.018*
(0.008)
−0.024
(0.017)
−0.038
(0.050)
(3) Estimate when comparing Sundays vs. Friday & Saturday 0.037*
(0.018)
0.034
(0.021)
0.049
(0.025)
0.045***
(0.015)
−0.001
(0.020)
−0.009
(0.017)
(4) Estimate when removing days adjacent to Sunday (removing Saturday and Monday) 0.049*
(0.020)
0.049*
(0.022)
0.046
(0.035)
0.071**
(0.025)
0.038*
(0.018)
0.002
(0.036)
(5) Estimate by negative binomial regressions 0.042*
(0.019)
0.040*
(0.020)
0.043
(0.031)
0.059**
(0.021)
0.033*
(0.014)
−0.012
(0.027)

Note: See the note in Table 4. All the other coefficients ((2)~(5)) are fro separate regressions and stand for estimates of changes in crime incident numbers a day in terms of average marginal effects. For the statistical significance,

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001.