Table 11.
For the entire stores in the low SES neighborhoods (N=213,363) (15 treatment and 50 control groups) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total crime | Violent crime | Property crime | Misdemeanor | |
(1) Within 1/8-mile radius | p = 0.000 (***) | p = 0.034 (*) | p = 0.000 (***) | p = 0.000 (***) |
(2) Between 1/8- and 1/4-mile radii | p = 0.012 (*) | p = 0.720 | p = 0.007 (***) | p = 0.000 (**) |
(3) Between 1/4- and 1/2-mile radii | p = 0.124 | p = 0.413 | p = 0.046 (*) | p = 0.163 |
For the reduced stores in the low SES neighborhoods (N=97,147) (2 treatment and 17 control groups) | ||||
Total crime | Violent crime | Property crime | Misdemeanor | |
(1) Within 1/8-mile radius | p = 0.000 (***) | p = 0.081 | p = 0.122 | p = 0.038 (*) |
(2) Between 1/8- and 1/4-mile radii | p = 0.284 | p = 0.363 | p = 0.319 | p = 0.041 (*) |
(3) Between 1/4- and 1/2-mile radii | p = 0.806 | p = 0.440 | p = 0.488 | p = 0.961 |
Note: Values in cells indicate proportions of the shuffled DDD regression coefficients whose absolute values were greater than the absolute values of our estimated DDD coefficient, which means the two-tailed p-values of the permutation tests. For the statistical significance,
p<0.05;
p<0.01;
p<0.001.