Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Apr 15;40(5):1111–1121. doi: 10.1111/acer.13047

Table 11.

P-values of permutation tests for W&S stores in the low-SES neighborhoods

For the entire stores in the low SES neighborhoods (N=213,363) (15 treatment and 50 control groups)
Total crime Violent crime Property crime Misdemeanor
(1) Within 1/8-mile radius p = 0.000 (***) p = 0.034 (*) p = 0.000 (***) p = 0.000 (***)
(2) Between 1/8- and 1/4-mile radii p = 0.012 (*) p = 0.720 p = 0.007 (***) p = 0.000 (**)
(3) Between 1/4- and 1/2-mile radii p = 0.124 p = 0.413 p = 0.046 (*) p = 0.163
For the reduced stores in the low SES neighborhoods (N=97,147) (2 treatment and 17 control groups)
Total crime Violent crime Property crime Misdemeanor
(1) Within 1/8-mile radius p = 0.000 (***) p = 0.081 p = 0.122 p = 0.038 (*)
(2) Between 1/8- and 1/4-mile radii p = 0.284 p = 0.363 p = 0.319 p = 0.041 (*)
(3) Between 1/4- and 1/2-mile radii p = 0.806 p = 0.440 p = 0.488 p = 0.961

Note: Values in cells indicate proportions of the shuffled DDD regression coefficients whose absolute values were greater than the absolute values of our estimated DDD coefficient, which means the two-tailed p-values of the permutation tests. For the statistical significance,

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001.