Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 8;7:3032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8

Table 1.

Sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and OR of the blood-based SEPT9 gene methylation assay in CRC detection or screening with various algorithm.

Publications Number of cases Sensitivity Specificity PLR NLR OR Algorithm Kit used
Grutzmann et al., 2008 309 (126 CRC, 183 control) 71.4% (90/126) 89.6% (164/183) 6.93 0.31 22.20 2/3 Research kit
Lofton-Day et al.3 312 (133 CRC, 179 control) 69% (92/133) 86% (154/179) 4.95 0.36 13.82 1/1 Research kit
deVos et al.26 514 (187 CRC, 327 control) 73.8% (138/187) 86.2% (282/327) 5.36 0.30 17.65 1/3 Research kit
56.1% (105/187) 96.6% (316/327) 16.69 0.45 36.78 2/3
He et al., 2010 352 (182 CRC, 170 NED) 74.7% (136/182) 96.5% (164/170) 21.17 0.26 80.81 1/1 Research kit
Weiss and Rosch, 2010 257 (103 CRC, 154 NED) 67.0% (69/103) 87.7% (135/154) 6.10 0.37 16.45 1/2 Epi proColon 1.0
Tanzer et al., 2010 67 (33 CRC, 34 control) 82% (27/33) 88% (30/34) 6.95 0.21 33.75 1/3 Epi proColon 1.0
73% (24/33) 91% (31/34) 8.24 0.30 27.56 2/3
Warren et al., 2011 144 (50 CRC, 94 control) 90.0% (45/50) 88.0% (83/94) 7.69 0.11 67.91 1/3 ARUP Lab LDT assay
76.0% (38/50) 99.1% (93/94) 71.44 0.24 294.50 2/3
Ahlquist et al., 2012 73 (30 CRC, 43 control) 60.0% (18/30) 79.1% (34/43) 2.87 0.51 5.67 1/3 ARUP Lab LDT assay
Toth et al., 2012 184 (92 CRC, 92 control) 95.6% (88/92) 84.8% (78/92) 6.29 0.05 122.57 1/3 Epi proColon 2.0
79.3% (73/92) 99% (91/92) 73.00 0.21 349.63 2/3
Wang et al., 2012 56 (36 CRC, 20 control) 69.4% (25/36) 90.0% (18/20) 6.94 0.34 20.45 1/1 research kit
Liu et al., 2013 57 (37 CRC, 20 control) 54.1% (20/37) 90.0% (18/20) 5.41 0.51 10.59 1/2 research kit
Church et al.7 1510 (53 CRC, 314 AA, 209 NAA, 934 NED) 48.2% (27/53) 91.5% (1333/1457) 5.67 0.57 10.02 1/2 Epi proColon 1.0
63.9% (34/53) 88.4% (1288/1457) 5.53 0.41 13.64 1/3
Potter et al., 2014 1544 (44 CRC, 621 AA,435 SP, 444 NED) 68.2% (30/44) 80.0% (1200/1500) 3.41 0.40 8.57 1/3 Epi proColon 2.0
Johnson et al.13 301 (101 CRC, 200 AA, SP and NED) 73.3% (74/101) 81.5% (163/200) 3.96 0.33 12.07 1/3 Epi proColon 2.0
Toth et al., 2014 58 (34 CRC, 24 NED) 88.2% (30/34) 91.7% (22/24) 10.59 0.13 82.50 2/3 Epi proColon 2.0
Kang et al.21 132 (80 CRC, 52 NED) 75.0% (60/80) 98.1% (51/52) 39.00 0.25 153.00 2/3 Epi proColon 2.0
He et al., 2014 281 (76 CRC, 69 Polyps, 136 NED) 71.1% (54/76) 95.6% (196/205) 16.18 0.30 53.45 2/3 Epi proColon 2.0
Jin et al.23 226 (135 CRC, 91 control) 74.8% (101/135) 96.7% (88/91) 22.69 0.26 87.14 2/3 Epi proColon 2.0
Yu et al., 2015 123 (70 CRC, 53 NED) 81.4% (57/70) 86.8% (46/53) 6.17 0.21 28.81 2/3 Epi proColon 2.0
Ørntoft et al., 2015 278 (128 CRC, 150 NED) 72.7% (93/128) 82.0% (123/150) 4.04 0.33 12.10 1/3 Epi proColon 2.0
58.6% (75/128) 95.3% (143/150) 12.47 0.43 28.91 2/3
Li et al., 2015 138 (91 CRC, 47 NED) 72.5% (66/91) 91.5% (43/47) 8.53 0.30 28.38 1/1 SensiColon
He et al., 2015 100 (50 CRC, 50 NED) 76.0% (38/50) 96.0% (48/50) 19.00 0.25 76.00 1/1 Research kit
Ding et al.25 182 (82 CRC, 100 NED) 73.2% (60/82) 96.0% (96/100) 18.30 0.28 65.45 2/3 Epi proColon 2.0
Wu et al.10 586 (291 CRC, 295 NED) 76.6% (223/291) 95.9% (283/295) 18.84 0.24 77.34 1/1 SensiColon
Song et al.11 859 (369 CRC, 490 NED) 82.4% (303/369) 82.0% (402/490) 4.58 0.21 20.97 1/3 Epi proColon 2.0
75.1% (277/369) 97.1% (476/490) 25.90 0.26 102.37 2/3

PLR = positive likelihood ratio, NLR = negative likelihood ratio, OR = odds ratio, CRC = colorectal cancer, NED = no evidence of diseases, AA = advanced adenoma, NAA = non-advanced adenoma, SP = small polyps, LDT = laboratory developed test.