Table 2.
Sensitivity for each CRC stage with 1/3, 2/3, 1/2 or 1/1 algorithm.
| Algorithm | Study | Stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||
| 1/3 | deVos et al.26 | 52.6% (10/19) | 75.0% (30/40) | 77.8% (21/27) | 100.0% (4/4) |
| Warren et al., 2011 | 71.4% (5/7) | 90.3% (28/31) | 100.0% (7/7) | 100% (5/5) | |
| Ahlquist et al., 2012 | 57.1% (4/7) | 57.1% (4/7) | 37.5% (3/8) | 87.5% (7/8) | |
| Toth et al., 2012 | 84.0% (21/25) | 100.0% (14/14) | 100.0% (35/35) | 100.0% (18/18) | |
| Johnson et al.13 | 61.5% (16/26) | 80.0% (16/20) | 65.2% (15/23) | 92.3% (12/13) | |
| Ørntoft et al., 2015 | 37.1% (13/35) | 91.4% (32/35) | 76.7% (23/30) | 89.3% (25/28) | |
| Song et al.11 | 64.3% (27/42) | 87.6% (92/105) | 87.8% (115/131) | 93.3% (14/15) | |
| Overall | 59.6% (96/161) | 85.7% (216/252) | 84.2% (219/261) | 93.4% (85/91) | |
| 2/3 | Grutzmann et al., 2008 | 50.0% (11/22) | 69.4% (25/36) | 79% (42/53) | 91% (10/11) |
| deVos et al.26 | 26.3% (5/19) | 60.0% (24/40) | 66.7% (18/27) | 75.0% (3/4) | |
| Toth et al., 2012 | 60.0% (15/25) | 92.8% (13/14) | 81.6% (31/35) | 77.8% (14/18) | |
| Kang et al.21 | 48.0% (12/25) | 82.6% (19/23) | 93.1% (27/29) | 66.7% (2/3) | |
| He et al., 2014 | 35.7% (5/14) | 81.0% (17/21) | 79.3% (23/29) | 80.0% (8/10) | |
| Jin et al.23 | 66.7% (12/18) | 82.6% (19/23) | 84.1% (37/44) | 100.0% (5/5) | |
| Ørntoft et al., 2015 | 17.1% (6/35) | 74.3% (26/35) | 63.3% (19/30) | 85.7% (24/28) | |
| Ding et al.25 | 50.0% (1/2) | 53.3% (16/30) | 87.5% (35/40) | 80.0% (8/10) | |
| Song et al.11 | 54.8% (23/42) | 82.9% (87/105) | 78.6% (103/131) | 86.7% (13/15) | |
| Overall | 44.6% (90/202) | 75.2% (246/327) | 80.1% (335/418) | 83.7% (87/104) | |
| 1/2 | Church et al.7 | 36.4% (8/22) | 57.1% (8/14) | 58.3% (7/12) | 80.0% (4/5) |
| Overall | 36.4% (8/22) | 57.1% (8/14) | 58.3% (7/12) | 80.0% (4/5) | |
| 1/1 | Lofton-Day et al.3 | 30.0% (6/20) | 56.3% (18/32) | 44.7% (21/47) | 67.7% (21/31) |
| Li et al., 2015 | 40.0% (2/5) | 65.5% (19/29) | 88.2% (15/17) | 88.9% (16/18) | |
| Wu et al.10 | 64.9% (24/37) | 72.7% (48/66) | 79.3% (65/82) | 93.9% (31/33) | |
| Overall | 51.6% (32/62) | 66.9% (85/127) | 69.2% (101/146) | 82.9% (68/82) | |