Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 8;7:3032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03321-8

Table 3.

Performance comparison between the SEPT9 and FIT assays in symptomatic population.

Publication Sensitivity Specificity
SEPT9 FIT SEPT9 FIT
Johnson et al.13 73.3% 68.0% 81.5% 97.4%
(74/101) (66/97) (163/200) (188/193)
Jin et al.23 74.8% 58.0% 87.4% 82.4%
(101/135) (40/69) (298/341) (89/108)
Wu et al.10 77.0% 74.6% 94.2% N/A
(181/235) (53/71) (697/740) N/A
Overall 75.6% 67.1% 90.4% 92.0%
(356/471) (159/237) (1158/1281) (277/301)