Skip to main content
. 2005 Feb;15(2):269–275. doi: 10.1101/gr.3185605

Table 1.

A summary of the genotyping for two representative batches of the HapMap study

Batch Detection scheme Probes designed Base-call parameters Probes converted Conversion Repeatability Trio accuracy Completeness
4 2 color 6072 1 5469 90.1% 99.5% 99.6% 98.0%
6072 2 5127 84.4% 99.6% 99.7% 99.3%

6072
3
4706
77.5%
99.8%
99.9%
99.25%
4 color 6072 1 5729 94.4% 99.6% 99.6% 98.6%
6072 2 5416 89.2% 99.6% 99.7% 99.7%
6072 3 4984 82.1% 99.9% 99.96% 99.5%
6 2 color 12234 1 10924 89.3% 99.5% 99.7% 98.6%
12234 2 10341 84.5% 99.7% 99.7% 99.6%
12234 3 9517 77.5% 99.95% 99.9% 99.5%

Batch 4 contains 6072 probes and was genotyped across the population using a two-color detection method and then repeated using a four-color detection method. Batch 6 contained 12,234 probes and was only genotyped using a two-color assay. The performance metrics are defined in the text. Results are shown for each data set with varying choices of base-calling parameters. “Parameter set 1” optimizes the conversion rate, “Parameter set 2” optimizes the completeness of the set of converted markers and “Parameter set 3” optimizes the concordance metrics as a surrogate for accuracy.