Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 14;83(7):1499–1505. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13236

Table 1.

Summary of LNG and EO PK parameters

Plasma PK parameter Geometric mean (95% CI) GLS mean ratio (90% CI)
OC alone (n = 19) OC + CAB (n = 19) (OC + CAB/OC alone)
LNG
AUC 0–τ (ng × h ml –1 ) 77.4 (64.5, 92.9) 87.0 (72.1, 104.9) 1.12 (1.07, 1.18)
C max (ng ml –1 ) 6.86 (5.84, 8.06) 7.20 (6.28, 8.26) 1.05 (0.96, 1.15)
C τ (ng ml –1 ) 2.41 (1.98, 2.95) 2.59 (2.09, 3.22) 1.07 (1.01, 1.15)
t max a (h) 1.00 (0.5–2.5) 1.00 (0.5–3.0) ND
EO
AUC 0–τ (pg × h ml –1 ) 773b (656, 911) 800c (698, 916) 1.02 (0.97, 1.08)
C max (pg ml –1 ) 86.2 (72.4, 102.7) 79.5 (68.0, 92.8) 0.922 (0.83, 1.03)
C τ (pg ml –1 ) 16.0b (12.5, 20.4) 15.7c (12.9, 19.0) 1.00 (0.92, 1.10)
t max a (h) 1.00 (0.5–2.5) 1.5 (0.5–2.6) ND

EO was not quantifiable at 24 h post dose for two subjects receiving OC alone and one subject receiving OC + CAB; therefore, EO AUC0–τ and Cτ were not reported for these cases. AUC0–τ, area under the plasma concentration–time curve over the dosing interval of duration τ; CAB, cabotegravir; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration; Cτ, concentration at the end of dosing interval; EO, ethinyl oestradiol; GLS, geometric least squares; LNG, levonorgestrel; ND, not determined; OC, oral contraceptive; PK, pharmacokinetic; tmax, time of Cmax.

a

Median (range)

b

n = 17

c

n = 18