Table 16.
Parameter estimates of change of mobile phone self-efficacy (MPSE) from low to high (valued [attractive + one-dimensional] over indifferent).
Design feature | Mobile phone self-efficacy (H vs L) | 95% CI for odds ratio (lower bound-upper bound) |
|||
b | Wald | Significance | Odds ratio | ||
A3 | 0.948 | 2.1 | .15 | 2.58 | 0.71-9.43 |
A6 | 0.698 | 1.7 | .20 | 2.01 | 0.70-5.78 |
A8 | 0.309 | 0.3 | .56 | 1.36 | 0.48-3.84 |
A10 | 0.198 | 0.1 | .73 | 1.22 | 0.40-3.73 |
A13 | 0.887 | 2.6 | .11 | 2.43 | 0.83-7.13 |
A18 | 0.189 | 0.1 | .72 | 1.21 | 0.43-3.38 |
A22 | 0.569 | 1.2 | .28 | 1.77 | 0.63-4.97 |
A25 | 1.048 | 3.7 | .05 | 2.85 | 0.98-8.26 |
A26 | 1.237 | 4.8 | .03 | 3.44 | 1.15-10.35 |
A29 | 0.908 | 2.8 | .10 | 2.48 | 0.85-7.25 |
A35 | 1.010 | 1.8 | .18 | 2.75 | 0.64-11.88 |
A41 | 0.398 | 0.6 | .46 | 1.49 | 0.52-4.24 |
A45 | 0.455 | 0.7 | .40 | 1.58 | 0.55-4.52 |
A48 | 0.213 | 0.2 | .69 | 1.24 | 0.43-3.57 |