Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;5(5):e65. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6233

Table 5.

Categorizing design features by the total sample (n=103).

Design features Frequency of design feature Category strength (%) Total strength (%) Classification results

A M O I R Q


A30 28 15 23 33 1 3 5 64 X(I, A)a

aX(C1, C2) indicates that a design feature had close proportions in two categories of C1 and C2.